SCHEDULE 14-A INFORMATIONPicture 2

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party Other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.
Name of the Registrant as Specified In Its Charter
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
1.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2.

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3.

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state below how it was determined):

4.

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5.Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1.

Amount Previously Paid:

2.

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3.

Filing Party:

4.

Date Filed:


LOGO

Notice of Annual Shareholders Meeting

To be held March 8, 20125,  2014

To The Shareholders of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of the shareholders of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the WaterfordTower Hotel, formerly the Oklahoma City Marriott, 6300 Waterford Boulevard (63rd and North Pennsylvania),3233 Northwest Expressway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on Thursday,Wednesday, March 8, 2012,5, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.,1:30 p.m. local time, for the following purposes:

1.To elect the two nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as directors on the Company’s Board of Directors for terms of three years;

2.To elect the nominee named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as a director on the Company’s Board of Directors for a term of one year;

1.To elect the two nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as directors on the Company’s Board of Directors for terms of three years;

3.To approve an amendment to the Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. 2010 Restricted Stock Plan;

2.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012; and

4.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014;

3.To consider and act on any other matter as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

5.To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation;

6.To hold an advisory vote to determine the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and

7.To consider and act upon any other matter as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Only holders of record of the Common Stock at the close of business on January 23, 201221, 2014 will be entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements.

By Order of the Board of Directors

By Order of the Board of Directors

Picture 4

Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

LOGO
Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

January 27, 201228, 2014

Your Vote Is Important.Important.

Whether Or Not You Expect To Attend The Meeting, Please Mark, Sign And Date The Enclosed Proxy And Mail It Promptly In The Postage-Paid Envelope Provided.

Please Vote!


Table Of Contents

 


Table OfContents

Page

Page

Notice of Annual Meeting

1
 

Voting of Common Stock

2
 

Proposal No. 1—Election of Two DirectorsPROPOSAL NO. 1 –  ELECTION OF TWO DIRECTORS FOR THREE YEAR TERMS

3

         ENDING 2017

PROPOSAL NO. 2 –  ELECTION OF ONE DIRECTOR FOR A ONE YEAR TERM

         ENDING IN 2015

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors for Three Year Terms

Ending in 2017

Nominee for Election to the Board of Directors for a One Year Term

Ending in 2015

4
5 

Directors Whose Terms Continue Beyond the 20122014 Annual Meeting

and Who Areare Not Subject to Election Thisthis Year

5
6 

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

7

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

7
 

Lead Independent Director

8
 

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

8
 

Board Role in Risk Oversight

9
 

Compensation of Directors

10
 

Share Ownership Guidelines for Directors

11
12 

Transactions with Directors

11
12 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

12
 

Code of Ethics

12
13 

PROPOSAL NO. 3 –  APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE PANHANDLE OIL

         AND GAS INC. 2010 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN

13 

Description of the Amended Restricted Stock Plan

14 

PROPOSAL NO. 4 –  RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT

         REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

18 

Report of the Audit Committee

18 

Independent Accountants’ Fees and Services

20 

(i)


PROPOSAL NO. 5 – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

21 

Executive Compensation Overview

22 

Summary of Current Compensation Program

22 

Financial and Operating Performance – Fiscal 2013

22 

Information About our Executive Officers

23 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

23 

Report of the Compensation Committee

32 

Executive Compensation

32 

ESOP Plan

34 

PROPOSAL NO. 6  –  ADVISORY VOTE TO DETERMINE FREQUENCY OF

         FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

34 

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

35 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

12
35 

Proposal No. 2—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

12

Report of the Audit Committee

13

Independent Accountants’ Fees and Services

15

Executive Officers

16

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

17

Report of the Compensation Committee

23

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

24

Executive Compensation

24

Communications with the Board of Directors

28
35 

Shareholder Proposals

28
36 

Annual Report to Shareholders

29
37 

Form 10-K

29
37 

Other Matters

38 

APPENDIX A – Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. Amended 2010 Restricted Stock Plan

30

 

(i)

(ii)


(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)


Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300

Oklahoma City, OK  73112-5688

Annual Shareholders Meeting

March 8, 20125, 2014

Notice of Annual Meeting

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc., an Oklahoma corporation (the “Company”, “Panhandle”, “we”, “us” and “our”), for use at the Company’s annual shareholders meeting (the “meeting”) to be held at the WaterfordTower Hotel, formerly the Oklahoma City Marriott, 6300 Waterford Boulevard,3233 Northwest Expressway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on Thursday,Wednesday, March 8, 2012,5, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.1:30 p.m. local time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Shareholders Meeting.

When the proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares it represents will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the directions noted thereon.  If no direction is indicated, the persons named on the enclosed proxy will vote the proxy FOR the nominees for director in ProposalProposals No. 1 and No. 2 and FOR ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm in ProposalProposals No. 2.3 through No. 6.  Signed proxy cards without specified choices will be voted in the discretion of the proxies.    Should other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxy will be voted as the Board may recommend, except proxies which are marked to deny discretionary authority.

If the enclosed form of proxy is executed and returned, it still may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by signing and sending to the Company a later dated proxy or a written revocation, or by attending the meeting and voting in person.

If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, through a bank, broker or other nominee), follow the voting instructions on the form you receive from such firm.  IfIf you hold shares in “street name” and would like to attend the meeting and vote in person, you will need to bring a proxy to the meeting signed by the nominee in whose name your shares are registered.

The mailing address of the Company is 5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK  73112-5688.  The Company anticipates that the proxies and proxy statements will be mailed to shareholders beginning on or about January 27, 2012.28, 2014.  A copy of the Company’sCompanys Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20112013 accompanies this proxy statement.

The cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting will be paid by the Company.  In addition to solicitation by mail, arrangements may be made with brokerage firms, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxy material to their principals.  The Company will reimburse these institutions for their reasonable costs.costs.  No solicitation is to be made by specially engaged employees or other paid solicitors.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to be held on March 8, 2012:5, 2014: this proxy statement, form of proxy and the Company’s 20112013 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at the following website:www.proxydocs.com/phx.

 

(1)


Voting of Common Stock

All holders of Common Stock of record at the close of business on January 23, 201221, 2014 will be entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournments or postponements.  As of January 23, 2012,21, 2014, there were 8,304,5528,319,961 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01666 (“Common Stock”), outstanding, entitled to vote, owned by approximately 4,0003,700 shareholders.  A list of record shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination at least 10 days prior to the meeting at the Company’s offices during ordinary business hours and at the meeting.

The Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company provides for one vote for each share of Common Stock outstanding.  At the meeting, each record holder of Common Stock will be entitled to cast one vote per share of Common Stock held of record on the record date.  Votes may be cast by shareholders either present in person or by proxy.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting.  Abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining a quorum.  Broker “non-votes” are shares held by brokers or nominees over which the broker or nominee lacks discretionary power to vote (such as for the election of directors) and for which the broker or nominee has not received specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner.  For purposes of determining the outcome of any matter as to which the broker or nominee has indicated on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote, those shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with respect to that particular matter, even though those shares will be considered present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum and may be entitled to vote on other matters.

Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers or their nominees do not have the discretionary power to vote shares in uncontested director elections.on most matters.  At the meeting, they may only vote shares for the election of directors if they receive specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner.  In very limited circumstances, brokers generally do have discretion to vote on matters deemed to be routine.  If your shares are held by a broker or other nominee and if you do not provide such specific voting instructions, your shares can notcannot be voted for the election of directors.directors or any Proposal other than ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board has adopted a majority vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested director elections.  Accordingly, at the meeting, each nominee will be elected if the holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock present at the meeting and entitled to vote for the election of directors cast their votes “FOR”  the nominee.

The twothree nominees for director at the meeting are currently directors of the Company.  If any incumbent nominee for director fails to receive the required affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast for that director, under Oklahoma law and the Company’s Bylaws, the incumbent will remain in office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.  If any incumbent for director receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his election than votes “FOR”, he must promptly submit his offer of resignation from the Board for consideration by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board.  The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation.  The Board will act on the offered resignation, taking into account such

(2)


 

(2)


recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the offered resignation within 90 days from the date of the annual meeting.  The director who offered his resignation will not participate in any proceedings with respect to his offered resignation.  If the Board accepts a director’s offered resignation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the Board whether to fill such vacancy or reduce the size of the Board.  The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com.  www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

ProposalProposals No. 23 through No. 6 will be approved if the holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock present at the meeting and entitled to vote on each such Proposal No. 2 vote “FOR”FOR” the proposal.Proposal.

The Company knows of no arrangements which would result in a change in control of the Company at any future date.

The Company knows of no other matters to come before the meeting.  The Company did not receive any shareholder proposals.  If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxies solicited hereby will be voted on such matters as the Board may recommend, except proxies which are marked to deny discretionary authority.

A proxy is enclosed for your signature.  Please return it immediately, marked, dated and signed.  If your shares are held in “street name”, please provide voting instructions on the form you receive from your broker or other nominee.

Proposal No. 1

Proposal No. 1
Election of Two Directors for Three Year Terms Ending 2017

Proposal No. 2
Election of One Director for a One Year Term Ending in 2015

The present directors of the Company and their current Board Committee memberships are as follows:

 

 

 

Since

 

 

Name

 

Age

Positions/Offices Presently

Held with the Company 

Served As

Director Since

Present

Term Ends

Michael C. Coffman

60

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

2006

2014

Duke R. Ligon (1)(3)

72

Director

2007

2014

Robert O. Lorenz (1)(2)

67

Lead Independent Director

2003

2016

Robert A. Reece (1)(3)

69

Director

1986

2014

Robert E. Robotti (2)(3)

60

Director

2004

2016

Darryl G. Smette (1)(2)

66

Director

2010

2015

H. Grant Swartzwelder (2)(3)

50

Director

2002

2015

(1)Member of the Audit Committee.

(2)Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3)Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

(3)


 

Name

  Age  

Positions/Offices Presently

Held with the Company

  Served As
Director Since
  Present
Term Ends

Bruce M. Bell (2)(3)

  70  Director  2004  2013

Michael C. Coffman

  58  Director, President and Chief Executive Officer  2006  2014

E. Chris Kauffman (2)(4)

  71  Director  1991  2012

Duke R. Ligon (1)(3)

  70  Director  2007  2014

Robert O. Lorenz (1)(2)

  65  Lead Independent Director  2003  2013

Robert A. Reece (1)(4)

  67  Director  1986  2014

Robert E. Robotti (1)(2)

  58  Director  2004  2013

Darryl G. Smette (1)(2)

  64  Director  2010  2012

H. Grant Swartzwelder (3)(4)

  48  Director  2002  2012

 

(1)Member of the Audit Committee.
(2)Member of the Compensation Committee.
(3)Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
(4)Member of the Retirement Committee.

Under Oklahoma law,The Board believes it is in the Company is requiredCompany's best interest to continue to have a classified board structure with three year terms for its directors due to the uniqueness of Company assets, strategies and the minimal amount of shares outstanding.  Panhandle's ownership of perpetual fee mineral acres leads the Company to employ business strategies that are more long-term results oriented as compared to more traditional oil and gas companies.  This requires the Company's directors to have a long-term outlook and understanding rather than being focused on short term results.  This long-term results oriented focus has served the Company well, with demonstrated operating and financial results that continue to create value for our shareholders. Maintaining a consistent focus by a long-term oriented board is imperative and maintaining longer service for our board of directors that is divided into two orimportant in order to execute the overall strategy of Panhandle.

Nominees for the vacancies for the three classes.

year terms ending in 2017 are Michael C. Coffman and Robert A. Reece, both of whom are currently directors.

The nominee to fill the third vacancy for a one year term ending in 2015 is Duke R. Ligon, who is a current director.

(3)


The Board is divided into three classes, with the terms of office of each class ending in successive years.  Each director is elected for a three year term.  There are three directors whose terms expire in 2014 so normally three nominees would be proposed to fill the three vacancies with three year terms ending 2017.  Duke R. Ligon is one of the directors whose term expires in 2014.  When Mr. Ligon was re-elected to a three year term in 2011, he was 69 years of age.  The Company’s Bylaws provide that, at the time of re-election, a director must be less than 70 years of age, unless, in the sole discretion of the Board, a director who is over 70 may be re-elected for one additional term of one year.  The Board has determined to nominate Mr. Ligon for an additional term of one year ending in 2015.  At the 2015 Annual Shareholders Meeting, a person will be nominated to serve the remaining two vacanciesyears of what would have been a three year term for Mr. Ligon.  This will allow the three-year terms endingCompany to have its three classes of directors as nearly equal in 2012. Nominees fornumber as possible with the vacancies are Darryl G. Smette and H. Grant Swartzwelder, bothterm of whom are currently directors. office of one class expiring each year.

These twothree nominees were recommended by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved by the Board.  The Board has no reason to believe that either of the nomineesany nominee will be unable to serve as director.  However, if eitherany nominee should be unable for any reason to accept nomination or election, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote those proxies for the election of such other person or persons as the Board may recommend.

The other director whose term expires in 2012 is E. Chris Kauffman. Mr. Kauffman is not eligible for re-election because he has reached age 70. Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, a person may not stand for election or re-election as a director after attaining the age of 70.

The Board currently intends to reduce the size of the Board from nine to eight members rather than elect a replacement for Mr. Kauffman.

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors For Terms Ending in 2015

Darryl G. Smette joined Devon Energy Corporation (oil and gas exploration, production and transportation) in 1986 and currently serves as Executive Vice President of Marketing, Midstream and Supply Chain. Mr. Smette is a member of Devon’s Capital Budget Committee and the senior management Executive Committee and as such is charged with developing and executing Devon’s corporate strategy. Mr. Smette is also responsible for marketing, midstream operations and procurement and logistics of goods and services. Prior to joining Devon, Mr. Smette worked in the oil and gas industry for 15 years. Mr. Smette holds an MBA degree. He was elected to the Board in August 2010.

Mr. Smette’s qualifications to serve on the Board are his extensive operational experience in the oil and gas industry, including, exploration, production, distribution and marketing, and in developing and executing the corporate business strategies for a major independent oil and gas company.

H. Grant Swartzwelder is president of PetroGrowth Advisors and Pg Energy Holdings, LP, both in Irving, Texas (investment banking and venture capital) and both of which he founded in 1998. Since 1998, he has founded and managed several private companies engaged in various aspects of the oil and gas service business. Prior to 1998, he was vice president of Principal Financial Securities, Inc., Dallas, Texas (an investment-banking firm). He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering and an MBA degree.

Mr. Swartzwelder’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his investment banking and venture capital experience, his founding and management of several oil and gas service businesses and his background in petroleum engineering.

The Board of Directors Recommends That The Shareholders

Vote “FOR” The Election of

Darryl G. Smette And H. Grant Swartzwelder

As Directors

(4)


Directors Whose Terms Continue Beyond the 2012 Annual Meeting and Who Are Not Subject to Election this Year

Directors Whose Terms End in 2013

Dr. Bruce M. Bell has been CEO of Post Oak Oil Company (oil and gas exploration and production) since 1983 and president and CEO of Edrio Oil Co. Inc. (oil and gas exploration and production) since 1982, both of Oklahoma City. He served as chairman of the Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association (oil and gas trade association) from 1997 to 2006. Dr. Bell holds a Ph.D. degree in paleontology.

Dr. Bell’s qualifications to serve on the Board include operating oil and gas exploration and production companies for over 30 years and his chairmanship for 10 years of a major oil and gas trade association.

Robert O. Lorenz is a former audit partner of Arthur Andersen LLP. He served as the managing partner of the Oklahoma City office beginning in 1994 and as the managing partner of the Oklahoma practice beginning in 2000. He retired from Arthur Andersen in 2002. Since 2005, Mr. Lorenz has been a director of OGE Energy Corp. (regulated electric utility and natural gas transportation), and was a director of Infinity Inc. (oil and gas exploration and development) from 2004 to 2009. He also served as a director of Kerr-McGee Corporation (oil and gas exploration and production) from 2005 to 2006 when it was acquired by Anadarko Petroleum Corp.

Mr. Lorenz’s qualifications to serve on the Board include over 30 years in public accounting, his expertise in the areas of finance and accounting, and his broad experience as a director of large public companies.

Robert E. Robotti, since 1983, has been the president of Robotti & Company, LLC (a registered broker-dealer), president of Robotti & Company Advisors, LLC (a registered investment advisor), or their predecessors, and, since 1980, has been the managing member of Ravenswood Investment Company, LLC, which serves as the general partner of three investment partnerships, all located in New York City. Since 2007, Mr. Robotti has served as a portfolio manager and managing member of Robotti Global Fund, LLC, a global equity fund. Mr. Robotti has been a director of Pulse Seismic, Inc. (oil and gas seismic) since 2007 and, from November 2006 to January 2007, he was a director of Advanced Marketing Services (book distribution) which filed for bankruptcy in December 2007. Mr. Robotti holds an MBA degree. He is a member of the New York Society of Security Analysts.

Mr. Robotti’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his vast experience in the investment business as the owner of a registered broker-dealer and registered investment advisor, as the manager of several investment partnerships and as a portfolio manager of a global equity fund. He has served as a director of several public companies.

Directors Whose Terms End in 2014

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors for Three Year Terms Ending in2017

Michael C. Coffman has worked in public accounting and as a financial officer with companies involved in the oil and gas industry since 1975.  He joined the Company in 1990 as its treasurer.  From 1995 to 2006, he served as vice-president and chief financial officer.  From 2006 to August 2007, he served as co-president and chief financial officer.  Since August 2007, he has served as president and chief executive officer.  He was elected to the Board in 2006.  Since January 1, 2013, Mr. Coffman has been a director of the Oklahoma City branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and he has been a director of Equal Energy Ltd. (oil and gas production) since May 2013.

(4)


 

(5)


Mr. Coffman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his 3537 years in the oil and gas exploration and production industry his experience in public accounting and his skills and experience in financial, accounting and acquisition matters.

Robert A. Reece is an attorney and since 1980 has been of counsel with the law firm of Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, and active in the management of his family’s investments, including significant oil and gas holdings.  He has been a director of NBC Bank (a state chartered bank) of Oklahoma City since 1982.  He holds an MBA degree.  Mr. Reece was elected to the Board in 1986.

Mr. Reece’s qualifications to serve on the Board include extensive experience in the legal, oil and gas and private equity investment fields.  Mr. Reece has managed significant investments for his family for over 35 years.

The Board of Directors Recommends That The Shareholders

Vote “FOR” The Election of

Michael C. Coffman And Robert A. Reece

As Directors

Nominee for Election to the Board of Directors for a One Year Term Ending in2015

Duke R. Ligon is an attorney and currently is the owner and manager of Mekusukey Oil Company LLC (oil and gas royalty company).  He served as senior vice president and general counsel of Devon Energy Corporation (oil and gas exploration, production and transportation) from 1997 until he retired in 2007.  Prior to 1997, Mr. Ligon was a partner in the law firm of Mayer Brown LLP, New York City.  From 2007 to 2010, he served as strategic advisor to Love’s Travel Stops and Country Stores (convenience stores and midstream energy transportation).  He has been a director of PostRock Energy Corporation (oil and natural gas transportation) since 2006, Blue KnightBlueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.) (crude oil terminaling, storage, gathering and transportation) since 2009, SteelPath MLP Funds Trust (investment company) since 2010, SteelPath Energy Infrastructure InvestmentVantage Drilling Company (investment company)(offshore drilling) since 2010, and Vantage Energy Services,Emerald Oil, Inc. (offshore drilling)(oil and gas production) since 2010.2011.  He was a director of Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. (sale of legal expense plans) from 2007 tountil its sale in 2011, TransMontaigne Partners, L.P. (distribution and marketing of petroleum products) from 2008 to 2009, and Teppco Partners LP (crude oil transportation) in 2009.2009, and SteelPath MLP Funds Trust (investment company) from 2010 until November 2012 when the company was sold, but remains on the Advisory Board through 2014.  Mr. Ligon was elected to the Company’s Board in August 2007.

Mr. Ligon brings expertise to the Board in legal, investment banking and financial matters having practiced law in a large New York law firm, worked in the investment banking business and served as general counsel of a majorlarge independent oil and gas company.  Mr. Ligon has served as a director of several large public companies and has extensive contacts in the oil and gas and financial industries.

Robert A. Reece

(5)


The Board of Directors Recommends That The Shareholders

Vote “FOR” The Election of

Duke R. Ligon As A Director

Directors Whose Terms Continue Beyond the 2014 Annual Meeting and Who are Not Subject to Election this Year

Directors Whose Terms End in 2015

Darryl G. Smette joined Devon Energy Corporation (oil and gas exploration, production and transportation) in 1986 and currently serves as Executive Vice President of Marketing, Midstream and Supply Chain.  Mr. Smette is an attorneya member of Devon’s  Capital Budget Committee and since 1980 has beenthe senior management Executive Committee and as such is charged with developing and executing Devon’s corporate strategy.  Mr. Smette is also responsible for marketing, midstream operations and procurement and logistics of counsel with the law firm of Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City,goods and activeservices.  Prior to joining Devon, Mr. Smette worked in the management of his family’s investments, including significant oil and gas holdings. He has been a director of NBC Bank (a state chartered bank) of Oklahoma City since 1982. Heindustry for 16 years.  Mr. Smette holds an MBA degree.  He was elected to the Board in August 2010.

Mr. Reece’sSmette’s qualifications to serve on the Board are his extensive operational experience in the oil and gas industry, including, exploration, production, distribution and marketing, and in developing and executing corporate business strategies for a large independent oil and gas company.

H. Grant Swartzwelder is president of PetroGrowth Advisors and PG Energy Holdings, LP, Irving, Texas (investment banking and venture capital), both of which he founded in 1998.  Since 1998, he has founded and managed several private companies engaged in various aspects of the oil and gas service business.  Prior to 1998, he was vice president of Principal Financial Securities, Inc., Dallas, Texas (an investment-banking firm).  He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering and an MBA degree.  He was elected to the Board in 2002.

Mr. Swartzwelder’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his investment banking and venture capital experience, his founding and management of several oil and gas service businesses and his background in petroleum engineering.

Directors Whose Terms End in 2016

Robert O. Lorenz is a former audit partner of Arthur Andersen LLP.  He served as the managing partner of the Oklahoma City office beginning in 1994 and as the managing partner of the Oklahoma practice beginning in 2000.  He retired from Arthur Andersen in 2002.  Since 2005, Mr. Lorenz has been a director of OGE Energy Corp.  (regulated electric utility and natural gas transportation), and was a director of Infinity Inc. (oil and gas exploration and development) from 2004 to 2009.  He was elected to the Board in 2003.

Mr. Lorenz’s qualifications to serve on the Board include over 30 years in public accounting, his expertise in the areas of finance and accounting, and his broad experience as a director of public companies engaged in the energy business.

Robert E. Robotti, since 1983, has been the president of Robotti & Company, LLC (a registered broker-dealer), president of Robotti & Company Advisors, LLC (a registered investment

(6)


advisor), or their predecessors, and, since 1980, has been the managing member of Ravenswood Investment Company, LLC, which serves as the general partner of three investment partnerships, all located in New York City.  Since 2007, Mr. Robotti has served as a portfolio manager and managing member of Robotti Global Fund, LLC, a global equity fund.  Mr. Robotti holds an MBA degree and is a member of the New York Society of Security Analysts.  He was elected to the Board in 2004.

Mr. Robotti’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience in the legal, oilinvestment business as the owner of a registered broker-dealer and gasa registered investment advisor, as the manager of several investment partnerships and privateas a portfolio manager of a global equity investment fields. Mr. Reece has managed significant investments for his family for over 35 years.fund.

None of the organizations described in the business experiences of the Company’s directors and officers are parents, subsidiaries or affiliates of the Company, or except for Mr. Kauffman’s insurance agency, do business with the Company.  The Company for many years, in the ordinary course of its business, has participated on industry terms through its mineral acreage ownership in the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells infor which Devon Energy Corporation hasserves as the operator.  Darryl G. Smette is an interest.Executive Vice President of Devon.  See “Transactions with Directors” below.

None of the non-management directors have ever been employees of the Company.

(6)


Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Based on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we know that the following shareholders are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2011. Robert E. Robotti, a director of the Company, also owns beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock which is set forth below in “Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers”.

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

  Amount of  Shares
Beneficially Owned
  Percent of
Common  Stock
 

BlackRock, Inc.

40 E. 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

   509,406(1)   6.1

Amica Mutual Insurance Company

100 Amica Way

Lincoln, RI 02965

   529,433(2)   6.4

(1)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC in December, 2010.

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

(2)Based on information received from Amica Mutual Insurance Company on January 5, 2012.

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information with respect to the outstanding shares of Common Stock owned beneficially as of December 31, 20112013 by each director, nominee for director and executive officerofficers and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

Amount of Shares

Beneficially Owned(3)(4)

Percent of

Common Stock

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr. (2)(5)

 

67,659 

 

 

*

Michael C. Coffman (1)(2)(5)

 

168,981 

 

 

2.1% 

Duke R. Ligon (1)

 

211,217 

 

 

2.6% 

Robert O. Lorenz (1)

 

4,200 

 

 

*

Lonnie J. Lowry (2)(5)

 

17,709 

 

 

*

Robert A. Reece (1)

 

30,162 

 

 

*

Robert E. Robotti (1)
c/o Robotti & Company, LLC
6 E. 43rd St., 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017

 

714,680 

 

 

8.7% 

Darryl G. Smette (1)

 

1,842 

 

 

*

Ben Spriestersbach (2)(5)

 

20,277 

 

 

*

H. Grant Swartzwelder (1)

 

8,272 

 

 

*

Robb P. Winfield (2)(5)

 

7,525 

 

 

*

 

 

-----------

 

 

---------

All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

 

1,252,524 

 

 

15.1% 

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Amount of  Shares
Beneficially Owned (3) (4)
   Percent of
Common  Stock
 

Bruce M. Bell (1)

   1,100     *  

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr. (2)(5)

   35,436     *  

Michael C. Coffman (1)(2)(5)

   144,570     1.7

E. Chris Kauffman (1)

   32,400     *  

Duke R. Ligon (1)

   207,633     2.5

Robert O. Lorenz (1)

   4,200     *  

Lonnie J. Lowry (2)(5)

   13,252     *  

Robert A. Reece (1)

   36,625     *  

Robert E. Robotti (1)
c/o Robotti & Company, LLC
6 E. 43rd St., 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017

   

 

 

768,982

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

 

Darryl G. Smette (1)

   1,815     *  

Ben Spriestersbach (2)(5)

   10,431     *  

H. Grant Swartzwelder (1)

   8,272     *  

Robb P. Winfield (2)(5)

   3,617     *  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)

   1,268,363     15.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

*Less than 1% owned
*Less than 1% owned

 

(7)



(1)Director
(2)Executive Officer
(3)The number of shares shown includes shares that are individually or jointly owned, as well as shares over which the individual has either sole or shared investment or voting authority.
(4)The number of shares shown does not include future share amounts recorded to each outside director’s account under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. See “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors—Compensation of Directors, footnote (2) of table entitled “Directors Compensation For Fiscal 2011”.
(5)The number of shares shown for Messrs. Blanchard, Coffman, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield include unvested shares of restricted stock granted under the Company’s 2010 Restricted Stock Plan and their shares in the ESOP Plan.

Lead Independent (1)Director

(2)Executive Officer

(3)The number of shares shown includes shares that are individually or jointly owned, as well as shares over which the individual has either sole or shared investment or voting authority.

(4)The number of shares shown does not include future share amounts recorded to each outside director’s account under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. These share amounts represent shares to be issued in the future and have no investment or voting authority.  See “Compensation of Directors” - footnote (2) of table entitled “Directors Compensation For Fiscal 2013”, on page 10.

(5)The number of shares shown for Messrs. Coffman, Blanchard, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield include unvested shares of restricted stock awarded under the Company’s 2010 Restricted Stock Plan and their shares in the Company’s ESOP Plan over which they exercise voting authority.

Lead Independent Director

Effective November 1, 2008, the Board named Robert O. Lorenz as Lead Independent Director and eliminated the position of Chairman of the Board.  The Lead Independent Director presides at all Board meetings and all executive sessions of outside directors.  The Board adopted a “Charter of Lead Independent Director” which can be viewed at the Company’s website: www.panhandleoilandgas.com.www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 20112013 (“fiscal 2011”2013”), the Board held sevensix meetings.  At each meeting, a quorum of directors was present.  The outside directors hold executive sessions at each Board meeting without management present.  The Company expects all of its directors to attend each annual shareholders meeting.  All directors except Mr. Robotti, attended the 20112013 annual shareholders meeting.

During fiscal 2011,2013, each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and each of the Board committees on which he served.

The Board has determined that, under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, all directors are currently independent, except for Michael C. Coffman, Chief Executive Officer, who does not serve on any Board committee.

The members of the Board are elected to various committees.  The Board presently has fourthree standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Retirement.Nominating. 

The Audit Committee is comprised of Robert O. Lorenz, chair, Duke R. Ligon, Robert A. Reece Robert E. Robotti and Darryl G. Smette.  For information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee, its membership and the number of meetings held during fiscal 2011,2013, see “Report of the Audit Committee” below.  EachThe Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets all applicable independence and financial literacy requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and of the New York Stock Exchange.  Robert O. Lorenz has been determined by the Board to meet the “audit committee financial expert” requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange.  A copy of theThe Audit Committee Charter can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com. www.panhandleoilandgas.com. 

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Darryl G. Smette, chair, Bruce M. Bell, E. Chris Kauffman, Robert O. Lorenz, and Robert E. Robotti.Robotti and H. Grant Swartzwelder.  The Committee met threefour times during fiscal 2011.2013.  The Committee reviews officer performance and recommends to the Board compensation amounts

(8)


for executive officers and directors.  See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.  The Compensation Committee also oversees the administration of the Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan and Trust Agreement (the “ESOP Plan”).  The Compensation Committee Charter can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

(8)


The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised of Duke R. Ligon, chair, Bruce M. BellRobert A. Reece, Robert E. Robotti and H. Grant Swartzwelder.  ThisThe Committee met twice during fiscal 2011.2013.  The Committee’s charter can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com. www.panhandleoilandgas.com.  Functions of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee include: search for, identify and screen individuals qualified to become members of the Board; recommend to the Board when new members should be added to the Board; recommend to the Board individuals to fill vacant Board positions; and recommend to the Board nominees for election as directors at the annual shareholders meeting.  If a vacancy on the Board exists that will not be filled by an incumbent director, the Committee identifies prospective nominees primarily through business and industry contacts.  At a minimum, in its assessment of potential Board candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will review each candidate’s character, wisdom, acumen, business skills and experience, understanding of and involvement in the oil and gas industry, and ability to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities.  It is the policy of the Company to seek the most qualified candidates for Board membership without regard to race, gender, national origin, religion, disability, age or sexual orientation.  The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominees proposed by shareholders of the Company if the requirements set forth in the Company’s Bylaws are satisfied.  For more information, see “Shareholder Proposals” below.  Those nominations must include sufficient biographical information so that the Committee can appropriately assess the proposed nominee’s background and qualifications.  To propose a prospective nominee for the Committee’s consideration, shareholders must submit the proposal in writing to Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc., Attention:  Secretary, 5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73112-5688.  Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to being named as a nominee and to serve as a director, if elected.  The Committee is responsible for overall corporate governance issues and compliance.  The Committee reviews periodically the corporate governance policies and principles of the Company and oversees and evaluates compliance with the Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Practices.

The RetirementCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised of Robert A. Reece, chair, E. Chris Kauffman and H. Grant Swartzwelder, and overseesCharter can be viewed at the administration of the Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan and Trust Agreement (the “ESOP Plan”). This Committee met twice during fiscal 2011.Company’s website: www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Board Role In Risk Oversight

Management is responsible for day-to-day risk assessment and mitigation activities.  The Board is responsible for risk oversight, focusing on the Company’s overall risk management strategy, its degree of tolerance for risk and the steps management is taking to manage the Company’s risk.  This process is designed to provide to the Board timely visibility about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks.  The Audit Committee assists the Board by annually reviewing and discussing with management this process and its functionality.  The areas of critical risk include information technology, strategic, operational, compliance, environmental and financial risks.  The full Board, or the Audit Committee, receives this information through updates from the appropriate members of management to enable it to understand and monitor the Company’sCompanys risk management

(9)


process.  Information brought to the attention of the Audit Committee can then be shared with the full Board, as appropriate.

(9)


Compensation of Directors

The following outlines the compensation plan for the Company’s outside directors for their services in all capacities.

The following table contains information with respect to fiscal 20112013 compensation of directors who served in such capacity at any time during fiscal 2011,2013, except for the fiscal 20112013 compensation of Michael C. Coffman, Chief Executive Officer, whose compensation is disclosed below in the caption “Executive Compensation—Compensation – Summary Compensation Table”.  OtherCurrently, other than the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan”), the Company has no stock award, stock option or other equity incentive plans for its directors.

Directors Compensation For Fiscal 2011

Name

  Fees Paid in Cash  or
Deferred(1)(2)
   All Other
Compensation(3)
   Total 

Bruce M. Bell

  $52,000    $2,635    $54,635  

E. Chris Kauffman

  $50,750    $6,024    $56,774  

Duke R. Ligon

  $53,500    $1,596    $55,096  

Robert O. Lorenz

  $76,000    $4,926    $80,926  

Robert A. Reece

  $49,500    $10,415    $59,915  

Robert E. Robotti

  $54,250    $3,184    $57,434  

Darryl G. Smette

  $55,250    $438    $55,688  

H. Grant Swartzwelder

  $53,250    $4,739    $57,989  

(1)All but one director deferred 100% of their retainers and fees under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. E. Chris Kauffman deferred 38% of his retainers and fees under the Plan and received cash payments for the remainder.
(2)At the end of fiscal 2011, the following future share amounts had been recorded  If the amendment to each director’s account under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan: Bell—10,444; Kauffman—21,849; Ligon—6,786; Lorenz—19,201; Reece—38,356; Robotti—12,444; Smette—2,664; and Swartzwelder—18,033.
(3)Under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, dividends paid on the Common Stock are recorded to each Director’s account on the record date of the dividend in the form of unissued shares. The amount recorded is based on the number of future unissued shares in each Director’s account and the closing market price of the Company Stock on each dividend record date.

Effective December 21, 2010, outside directors received for fiscal 2011 annual retainers of $35,000, $1,500 for attending each Board meeting, $1,000 for attending each committee meeting and out-of-pocket travel expenses for attending all meetings. Any director who travels over 50 miles to attend a Board or committee meeting receives an additional $500 for each meeting. In addition, during fiscal 2011, the Lead Independent Director and the chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees received additional annual retainers of $12,500, $10,000, $5,000 and $2,500, respectively. The annual retainers were paid in equal installments on December 31, 2010, and March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2011. This retainer and fee structure was guided by a study conducted by Longnecker & Associates, Houston, Texas (an independent compensation consultant) retained by the Compensation Committee to review the Company’s Board compensation levels.

(10)


Effective July 27, 2011, any director who participates2010 Restricted Stock Plan is approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting as set forth in a board meeting or committee meeting by conference telephone or other communications equipmentProposal No. 3, the directors will receive only one-half ofbe entitled to participate in the fee paid for attendance in person at these meetings.Plan.

Annually, outside directors may elect to be included in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.  The Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan provides that each outside director may individually elect to be credited with future unissued shares of Company stock rather than cash for all or a portion of the annual retainer,retainers, Board meeting fees and committee meeting fees, and also may elect to receive shares, if and when issued, over a period ofannual time periods up to ten years.  These unissued shares are recorded to each director’s deferred compensation account at the closing market price of the shares (i) on the dates of the Board and committee meetings, and (ii) on the payment dates of the annual retainers.  Only on a director’s retirement, termination, death, or a change-in-control of the Company will the shares recorded for such director under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan be issued to the director.  The promise to issue such shares in the future is an unsecured obligation of the Company.  All directors participateparticipated in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan in fiscal 2013.

Directors Compensation For Fiscal 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

Fees Paid in Cash or Deferred(1)(2)

All Other Compensation(3)

Total

Bruce M. Bell (4)

$

6,000 

$

854 

$

6,854 

Duke R. Ligon

$

55,000 

$

2,673 

$

57,673 

Robert O. Lorenz

$

74,500 

$

6,385 

$

80,885 

Robert A. Reece

$

46,500 

$

11,529 

$

58,029 

Robert E. Robotti

$

51,500 

$

4,215 

$

55,715 

Darryl G. Smette

$

56,250 

$

1,517 

$

57,767 

H. Grant Swartzwelder

$

54,750 

$

5,844 

$

60,594 

(10)


Share Ownership Guidelines(1)All directors deferred 100% of their retainers and fees under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2)At the end of fiscal 2013, the following future share amounts had been recorded to each director’s account under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan: Ligon– 10,708; Lorenz– 24,447; Reece– 42,351; Robotti– 16,113; Smette– 6,559; and Swartzwelder– 22,042.

(3)Under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, dividends paid on the Common Stock are recorded to each Director’s account on the record date of the dividend in the form of unissued shares.  The amount recorded is based on the number of future unissued shares in each Director’s account and the closing market price of the Company Stock on each dividend record date.  These future share amounts have no voting authority and the Directors have no investment authority with respect thereto.

(4)Retired from Board in December 2012.

For fiscal 2013, outside directors received annual retainers of $35,000, $1,500 for Directorsattending each Board meeting, $1,000 for attending each committee meeting and out-of-pocket travel expenses for attending all meetings.  Any director who traveled over 50 miles to attend a Board or committee meeting received an additional $500 for each meeting.  In addition, during fiscal 2013, the Lead Independent Director and the chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees received additional annual retainers of $12,500, $10,000, $5,000, and $5,000, respectively.  The annual retainers were paid in equal installments on December 31, 2012, and March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2013.  This retainer and fee structure was guided by a study conducted by Longnecker & Associates, Houston, Texas (an independent compensation consultant) retained by the Compensation Committee to review the Companys Board compensation levels.

Any director who participates in a board meeting or committee meeting by conference telephone or other communications equipment receives only one-half of the fee paid for attendance in person at these meetings.

For fiscal 2014, outside directors will receive annual retainers of $37,500, $1,500 for attending each Board meeting, $1,000 for attending each committee meeting and out-of-pocket travel expenses for attending all meetings.  Any director who travels over 50 miles to attend a Board or committee meeting receives an additional $500 for each meeting.  In addition, the Lead Independent Director and the chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees will receive additional annual retainers of $15,000, $10,000, $6,000 and $5,000, respectively.  The annual retainers are paid in equal installments on December 31,2013, March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2014.  The changes in retainers and fees for fiscal 2014 were guided by a study conducted by Longnecker & Associates, an independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee.

Longnecker & Associates has for several years recommended that Panhandle directors add an equity-based component to their compensation. To address Longnecker's recommendation, if Proposal 3, Amendment to 2010 Restricted Stock Plan, is approved by vote of the shareholders, the directors will become eligible to participate in the Plan. The initial grant of restricted stock to each director is planned to be valued at $35,000, will vest one-fourth each quarter and will be effective mid-March 2014.  According to Longnecker & Associates, with the adjustments to director compensation for fiscal 2014 and the $35,000 restricted equity award, Panhandle's directors will be compensated at about the 25th percentile range of peer company directors.    

(11)


Share Ownership Guidelines for Directors

The Bylaws of the Company require outside directors to own shares of the Company’s Common Stock in order to be a Board member.  To further align the interests of the Directors with the Company’s shareholders, each Director is expected to own that number of shares at the end of their third year of Board service which equals, on a cost basis, the aggregate amount of the three prior years’ Directors annual retainerDirectors’ retainers and the meeting fees for the five regularly scheduled Board meetings held each year during such three year period.  Future unissued shares that have been recorded to the directors’ accounts under the Director’s Deferred Compensation Plan may be used to satisfy this share ownership requirement.

Transactions with Directors

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers.

During fiscal 2011,The Company for many years in the Company purchased directorsordinary course of its business has participated on industry terms through its mineral acreage ownership in the drilling and officers liabilitycompletion of oil and other miscellaneous insurance policies through The Insurance Center Agency, Inc. for premiums aggregating $175,893. E. Chris Kauffmangas wells in which Devon Energy Corporation serves as the operator.  Darryl G. Smette is an owner and officerExecutive Vice President of the Agency. The Company believes that the premiums and the terms of the insurance policies were at market rates and on market terms.Devon.

We review any transactions and relationships in which the Company and any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or any of their immediate family members may be participants, so as to determine whether any of these individuals have a direct or indirect material interest in any such transaction.  We have developed and implemented processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers about related person transactions, and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in any such transaction.  Transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to a related person are disclosed in our proxy statement as required by SEC rules.

(11)


Pursuant to these processes, all directors and executive officers annually complete, sign and submit a directors’ and officers’ questionnaire that is designed to identify related person transactions and both actual and potential conflicts of interest.  We also make appropriate inquiries as to the nature and extent of business that the Company may conduct with other companies for whom any of our directors or executive officers also serve as directors or executive officers.  Under the Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Practices, if an actual or potential conflict of interest affects an executive officer or a director, he or she is to immediately disclose all the relevant facts and circumstances to the Company’s President or the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as appropriate.  If the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee determines that there is a conflict, it will refer the matter to the Board, which will review the matter to make a final determination as to whether a conflict exists,exists; and, if so, how the conflict should be resolved.  In addition, the Audit Committee reviews all reports and disclosures of actual and potential related person transactions.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The functions and members of the Compensation Committee are set forth above under “Proposal No. 1—1 and Proposal No. 2 – Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors”.Directors.”  All

(12)


Committee members are independent and none of the Committee members have served as an officer or employee of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company.

Code of Ethics

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Practices applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company.  In addition, the Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.  The Company’s Chief Executive Officer,  Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer were required to sign this code and will be held to the standards outlined in the code.  Copies of both codes are available at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com  www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Proposal No. 3
Approval Of Amendment To The Panhandle Oil And Gas Inc.
2010 Restricted Stock Plan

The Company is asking its shareholders to approve an amendment to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. 2010 Restricted Stock Plan from 100,000 shares to 250,000 shares and to allow the grant of shares of restricted stock to our directors.

The 2010 Restricted Stock Plan was initially approved by the shareholders at the Company’s 2010 Annual Shareholders meeting and covered 100,000 shares reserved for grant to officers of the Company.

As of December 21, 2013, an aggregate of 100,851 shares of common stock had been awarded under the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan.  December 21, 2013 is the last date restricted stock has been awarded.  The Company had repurchased 8,422 shares of common stock previously awarded but which did not vest, leaving only 7,571 shares available for grants in the future.

The Company believes that the grant of restricted shares that vest over several years is an essential long-term component to the Company’s total compensation package for its officers and also encourages officers to remain with the Company.

Under the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan,  directors were not eligible for stock awards.  The Company recommends that Directors become eligible for stock awards under the Plan.  We believe this will help retain and attract qualified directors and further align the directors’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders.

The Restricted Stock Plan was designed to provide as much flexibility as possible for future granting of restricted stock so that the Company can respond as necessary to provide competitive compensation in order to attract, retain and motivate officers and directors of the Company and to align their interests with those of the Company’s shareholders.

Until the Restricted Stock Plan was approved in 2010, the Company had not provided any equity incentives to its officers other than contributions of Common Stock to the Company’s ESOP Plan.  See “Executive Compensation”.

(13)


The Company intends to repurchase on the open market or in private transactions shares of Common Stock equal to the number of shares of restricted stock awarded on an annual basis under the Restricted Stock Plan in order to avoid dilution to existing shareholders.

The full text of the Amended 2010 Restricted Stock Plan as proposed to be amended (the “Amended Restricted Stock Plan”) is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement and a brief description of its material terms is provided below.    

Description of the Amended Restricted Stock Plan

Brief Summary of Proposed Amendments.  The number of shares covered by the Amended Restricted Stock Plan is increased from 100,000 shares to 250,000 shares and directors become eligible for awards of restricted stock.  Further, the Compensation Committee is given the authority to determine the vesting period for all awards to directors and officers.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceAwards. 

Section 16(a)The Restricted Stock Plan permits awards of restricted stock to Company officers and directors and is used by the Compensation Committee for retention and long-term incentive compensation.  The Company will sell shares of restricted stock to officers and directors at a significant discount to the fair market value of the Securitiesshares, generally at the par value of the shares.  The restricted shares may vest after the passage of time (which for officers will typically be several years on the anniversary dates of the issuance of the restricted stock) and Exchange Actmay vest depending on the market price performance of 1934 requires the Company’s Common Stock. The vesting period under the Plan will be determined by the Compensation Committee when it awards shares of Restricted Stock.  Under various vesting requirements, the restricted stock awards may wholly or partially vest or never vest.  The Company will repurchase the restricted stock at the original purchase price if vesting does not occur.

Officers participate in this program based on their (i) ability to make a significant contribution to the Company’s financial and operating results, (ii) level of responsibility and (iii) performance.  No officer is entitled to participate automatically based on title, position or salary level.  This program is designed to help retain key officers of the Company and participation is highly selective.

Longnecker & Associates has for several years recommended that Panhandle directors have an equity-based portion to their compensation.  To address Longnecker's recommendation, the amendment to the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan, Proposal No. 3, will include the directors as participants in the Plan. 

If Proposal 3, Amendment to 2010 Restricted Stock Plan, is approved by vote of the shareholders, the directors will become eligible to participate in the Plan.  The initial grant to directors is planned to be valued at $35,000, will vest one-fourth each quarter, and will be effective mid-March 2014.  According to Longnecker & Associates, with the adjustments to director compensation for fiscal 2014 and the $35,000 restricted equity award, Panhandle's directors will be compensated at about the 25th percentile range of peer company directors.    

Each participant in the Restricted Stock Plan enters into a stock restriction agreement with the Company setting forth the terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted stock award.  The restricted stock is issued by the Company in the name of the participant and deposited with the

(14)


Company, or an escrow agent determined by the Compensation Committee, until the restrictions lapse or until vesting is no longer possible under the stock restriction agreement.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the stock restriction agreement, a participant holding restricted stock has the right to receive dividends on the shares of restricted stock during the restriction period, vote the shares of restricted stock and enjoy other shareholder rights related to the restricted stock.  On expiration of the restriction period, subject to the terms of the Plan, the stock restriction agreement and the vesting requirements, the participant will be entitled to receive shares of Common Stock not subject to restriction.

Effective Date and Term.  The Stock Restriction Plan initially became effective in March, 2010 when approved by shareholders.  The Amended Restricted Stock Plan proposed herein will become effective when and if approved by the Company’s shareholders.  No restricted stock can be awarded after the day before the tenth anniversary of the date of shareholder approval, but the vesting periods for restricted stock previously sold may extend beyond that date.  If the Amended Stock Restriction Plan is approved by shareholders, the tenth anniversary will be measured from such approval.

Eligibility.  Any current officer or director of the Company, or any future subsidiary entities in which the Company has a controlling interest, as determined by the Compensation Committee, are eligible to be granted an award of restricted stock.

Administration.  The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which has authority to grant awards of restricted stock and determine the recipients and the terms of awards.  The Compensation Committee has full authority to construe and interpret the terms of the Amended Restricted Stock Plan and to determine all facts necessary to administer the Plan.

Stock Subject to the Restricted Stock Plan.  Subject to adjustments allowed under the Amended Restricted Stock Plan, awards of restricted stock which may be made under the Plan will increase to 250,000 shares from 100,000 shares of Common Stock if the proposed amendment to the Plan is approved by shareholders.  If any award of restricted stock expires or is terminated, surrendered or canceled without being fully vested, the unused shares covered by such award will again be available for awards under the Plan.

Restricted Stock.  Pursuant to the Amended Restricted Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant awards of restricted stock on the terms and conditions set forth by the Compensation Committee in the applicable stock restriction agreement, including the conditions for vesting, the vesting periods, the issue price and the acceleration of vesting in certain events.  The vesting periods for previous restricted stock awards to officers have been a minimum of two years.

Adjustments Due to Changes in Capitalization or Control.  In the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares, reclassification of shares, spin-off or other similar change in capitalization or event, or any dividend or distribution to holders of shares of Common Stock other than an ordinary cash dividend, (i) the number of shares of Common Stock available under the Amended Restricted Stock Plan, (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to and the repurchase price per share subject to each outstanding restricted stock award, and (iii) the terms of each other outstanding award shall be equitably adjusted by the Company in the manner determined by the Compensation Committee.

(15)


Change in Control.  On the occurrence of a change in control of the Company as defined in the Amended Restricted Stock Plan, except to the extent provided to the contrary in the stock restriction agreement between a participant and the Company, all restrictions and conditions on all restricted stock awards then outstanding shall automatically lapse and be deemed terminated or satisfied, as applicable.

Transferability of Awards.  Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, restricted stock will be nontransferable, either voluntarily or by operation of law, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order.

Voting and Dividends.  Holders of shares of restricted stock may vote their shares.  Dividends are paid on restricted stock.

Termination of Employment.  The Compensation Committee will determine the effect on restricted stock due to the disability, death, retirement, termination or other cessation or change in the employment, of a participant.

Tax Withholding.  A participant in the Amended Restricted Stock Plan must satisfy all applicable federal, state and local or other income and employment tax withholding obligations of the Company before it will authorize the restricted stock to be released by the Company or from escrow.  The Compensation Committee may allow a participant to satisfy all or part of these withholding obligations by transferring shares of restricted stock to the Company. 

Amendment of Awards.  The Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Amended Restricted Stock Plan or any portion of the Plan at any time; provided that if at any time the approval of the Company’s shareholders is required as to any modification or amendment under applicable laws and rules, the Compensation Committee may not effect such modification or amendment without shareholder approval.  Unless otherwise specified in the amendment, any amendment to the Amended Restricted Stock Plan shall apply to, and be binding on, the holders of restricted stock under the Plan at the time the amendment is adopted, provided, the Compensation Committee determines that such amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights of participants under the Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards.  The following table provides information on the holdings of restricted stock by our executive officers and persons who own more than ten percentat December 21, 2013 which is the last date restricted stock has been awarded.  

OUTSTANDING RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

 

 

 

 

 

Name

Award Date

Approval Date

Number of Shares of Restricted Stock That Have Not Vested

Market Value of Shares of Restricted Stock That Have Not Vested

Michael C. Coffman

June 18, 2010

May 19, 2010

3,500(1)(2)

$98,980(11)

 

December 21, 2010

December 21, 2010

9,821(3)(4)

$277,737(11)

 

December 08, 2011

December 08, 2011

11,990(5)(6)

$339,077(11)

 

December 11, 2012

December 11, 2012

13,361(7)(8)

$377,849(11)

 

December 21, 2013

December 11, 2013

12,290(9)(10)

$402,989(12)

 

 

 

 

 

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.

June 18, 2010

May 19, 2010

5,000(1)(2)

$141,400(11)

 

December 21, 2010

December 21, 2010

7,741(3)(4)

$218,915(11)

 

December 08, 2011

December 08, 2011

9,414(5)(6)

$266,228(11)

(16)


Name

Award Date

Approval Date

Number of Shares of Restricted Stock That Have Not Vested

Market Value of Shares of Restricted Stock That Have Not Vested

 

December 11, 2012

December 11, 2012

10,476(7)(8)

$296,261(11)

 

December 21, 2013

December 11, 2013

9,611(9)(10)

$315,145(12)

 

 

 

 

 

Lonnie J. Lowry

December 08, 2011

December 08, 2011

851(5)(6)

$24,066(11)

 

December 11, 2012

December 11, 2012

935(7)(8)

$26,442(11)

 

December 21, 2013

December 11, 2013

849(9)(10)

$27,839(12)

 

 

 

 

 

Ben Spriestersbach

December 08, 2011

December 08, 2011

689(5)(6)

$19,485(11)

 

December 11, 2012

December 11, 2012

1,285(7)(8)

$36,340(11)

 

December 21, 2013

December 11, 2013

467(9)(10)

$15,313(12)

 

 

 

 

 

Robb P. Winfield

December 08, 2011

December 08, 2011

668(5)(6)

$18,891(11)

 

December 11, 2012

December 11, 2012

748(7)(8)

$21,153(11)

 

December 21, 2013

December 11, 2013

1,155(9)(10)

$37,875(12)

(1)

Mr. Coffman and Mr. Blanchard paid $0.01666 per share, or $58.31 and $83.30, respectively, to purchase their restricted stock.

(2)

Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on June 18, 2010 which vest on the completion of five years of service, commonly known as “cliff vesting”.

(3)

Mr. Coffman and Mr. Blanchard paid $0.01666 per share, or $163.62 and $128.97, respectively, to purchase their restricted stock.

(4)

Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on December 21, 2010 to Mr. Coffman and Mr. Blanchard, 50% of which vests on the completion of three years of service, and 50% of which vests based on the market price performance of the Company's Common Stock at the completion of three years of service

(5)

Messrs. Coffman, Blanchard, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield paid $.01666 per share, or $199.75, $156.84, $14.18, $11.48 and $11.13, respectively.

(6)

Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on December 8, 2011, 25% of which vests on the completion of three years of service, and 75% of which vests based on the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock at the completion of three years of service.

(7)

Messrs. Coffman, Blanchard, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield paid $.01666 per share, or $222.59, $174.53, $15.58, $21.41 and $12.46, respectively.

(8)

Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on December 11, 2012, 25% of which vests on the completion of three years of service, and 75% of which vests based on the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock at the completion of three years of service.

(9)

Messrs. Coffman, Blanchard, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield paid $.01666 per share, or $204.75, $160.12, $14.14, $7.78 and $19.24, respectively.

(10)

Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on December 21, 2013, 25% of which vests on the completion of three years of service, and 75% of which vests based on the market price performance of the Company's Common Stock at the completion of three years of service.

(11)

Based on the closing market price of the Company's Common Stock of $28.28 on September 30, 2013.

(12)Based on the closing market price of the Company's Common Stock of $32.79 on December 20, 2013, the last trading date before the award.

Vesting of the performance shares of restricted stock awards is based on the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock at the completion of the time vesting period.  For performance shares to file withpartially vest, the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reportsCompany’s Common Stock must appreciate at a minimum rate of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of4% compounded annually.  If not, no performance shares vest.  To fully vest, the Common Stock must appreciate at a rate of 15% compounded annually.

An aggregate of 9,140 shares of restricted stock granted to Messrs. Coffman and Blanchard on December 21, 2010, vested on December 21, 2013 and an aggregate of 8,422 shares did not vest

(17)


and were repurchased by the Company.   Pursuant to furnishthe Plan, these unvested shares are again available for awards under the Restricted Stock Plan.

Vesting of the time vested restricted stock awards occurs only if the officers remain employed by the Company with copiesfor the required vesting period.  If not, all such awards are forfeited.

After the awards of such reports. Based on a reviewrestricted stock in December 2013,  and the vesting of restricted stock and the filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and representations that no other reports were filed,repurchase of unvested shares of restricted stock by the Company believes that during fiscal 2011 all directorson December 21, 2013, there are 7,571shares of Common Stock available under the current Restricted Stock Plan for future awards of restricted stock.  If the amendments to the Restricted Stock Plan proposed herein are approved by shareholders,  subject to future forfeitures and executive officers complied withrepurchases of unvested shares by the reporting requirementsCompany, there will be 157,571 shares of Section  16(a).

Proposal No. 2Common Stock available for future awards.

Proposal No. 4
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has directed the Company to submit the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20122014 for ratification by the shareholders at the meeting.  Neither the Company’s Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require shareholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.  However, the Audit Committee is submitting the

(12)


selection of Ernst & Young LLP to the shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.  If the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm.  Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during fiscal 20122014 if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to attend the meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions of shareholders.

For fiscal 2012, theThe Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to conduct quarterly reviews for the first three fiscal quarters.

Reportquarters of fiscal 2014.

Report of the Audit Committee

During fiscal 2011,2013, the Audit Committee was comprised of fivefour independent directors: Robert O. Lorenz, chair, Duke R. Ligon, Robert A. Reece, Robert E. Robotti and Darryl G. Smette.  The Board has determined that all committee members are independent and that Mr. Lorenz is an “audit committee financial expert”, as (as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines and the New York Stock Exchange), and that each member is financially literate as required by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.  For purposes of complying with New York Stock Exchange rules, the Board has determined that none of the Committee members currently serve on the audit committees of more than three public companies.  Four meetings of the Committee were held during fiscal 2011.2013. 

(18)


The Audit Committee Charter was adopted in December 2004 with immaterial changes subsequently approved by the Board.  A copy of the Charter can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com. www.panhandleoilandgas.com.   

The Audit Committee’s primary responsibility is to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board and report the results of its activities to the Board.  Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting.

Controls and Procedures.  Management has established and maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and includes controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in those reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As of September 30, 2011,2013, management conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  The Audit Committee discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“independent accountants”), the quality and adequacy of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures.

(13)


Management has also established and maintains a system of internal controls over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) underof the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  These internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the reported financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequate and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable.  Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth inInternal Control—Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on management’s evaluation under the framework inInternal Control—Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 20112013 as discussed in more detail in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, which was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011,2013, filed with the SEC on December 8, 2011.11, 2013.  The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20112013 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, as stated in its attestation report, which was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.2013.  The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Discussions with Management and Independent Accountants.    In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Committee reviewed with management the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2011,2013, including a discussion of the quality, not just the

(19)


acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.  The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles andprinciples.   The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee byunder generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees), as amended by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 90 (Audit Committee Communications). and SEC Rule 2‑07.  In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants its independence from management and the Company, including matters in the written disclosures and letter received from the independent accountants as required by the Independence StandardsPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board Standard No. 1 (Independence DiscussionsRule 3526 (Communications with Audit Committees)Committee Concerning Independence).

The Audit Committee met with the independent accountants, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope and plans for their audit, the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also met with the independent accountants and management after the end of each of the first three fiscal quarters.  At these meetings, the independent accountants’ review of quarterly results was presented and discussed and discussions were also held with management concerning these results.

(14)


In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20112013 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (which was filed on December 11, 2013).

Audit Committee

Audit Committee 

Robert O. Lorenz – Chair

Duke R. Ligon

Robert A. Reece

Darryl G. Smette

 Robert O. Lorenz—Chair

Duke R. Ligon

        Robert A. Reece

        Robert E. Robotti

        Darryl G. Smette

Independent Accountants’ Fees and Services

The following sets forth fees billed for audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20112013 and September 30, 2010:2012:

 

 

 

 

 

Fee Category

Fiscal 2013 Fees

Fiscal 2012 Fees

Audit Fees (1)

$

339,000

$

328,000

Audit-Related Fees

$

   ---

$

   ---

Tax Fees

$

   ---

$

   ---

All Other Fees

$

   ---

$

   ---

(1)Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements, reviews of the related quarterly financial statements and internal control audits required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Fee Category

  Fiscal 2011 Fees   Fiscal 2010 Fees 

Audit Fees (1)

  $318,500    $312,500  

Audit-Related Fees

  $—      $—    

Tax Fees

  $—      $—    

All Other Fees

  $—      $—    

(1)Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements, reviews of the related quarterly financial statements and internal control audits required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

All services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP were permissible under applicable laws and regulations and were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee’s pre-approval

(20)


policy is set forth in the Audit Committee Charter which can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com. www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on Proposal No. 24 must vote “FOR” ratification.  Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” ratification.

The Board of Directors Recommends That Shareholders

Vote “FOR”

Ratification of Selection of Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm

Proposal No.  5
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that we include in our proxy statements a non-binding vote on our executive compensation (commonly referred to as “Say-On-Pay”).  At the 2011 Annual Shareholders meeting, the Board recommended, and the shareholders approved, that the Say-on-Pay vote should occur every three years.  Accordingly, we include in this proxy statement a non-binding vote on our executive compensation as described in this proxy statement.

In Proposal No. 6, the Board now recommends that future Say-On-Pay votes by shareholders be held every year rather than every three years.

We encourage shareholders to review the discussion on executive compensation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below on pages 22 to 32 and the Executive Compensation section below on pages 32 to 34.  The Company’s consistent value creation over time is attributable to a rigorously-applied management process implemented over the years by successive teams of talented and committed executives.  The Company’s executive compensation underpins and reinforces this process and the performance it generates.  We believe our compensation program strikes the appropriate balance between utilizing fair and responsible pay practices and effectively incentivizing our executives to dedicate themselves fully to value creation for our shareholders. 

The Board strongly endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and recommends that the shareholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve on an advisory basis the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” and the other related tabular and narrative disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.

Because the vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board or the Compensation Committee and neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this Proposal.  The Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

(21)


 

(15)The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote


“For”

Approval of The Company’s Executive OfficersCompensation

Executive Compensation Overview

For fiscal 2013, Panhandle's executive compensation program was generally unchanged from fiscal 2012.  The program is designed to reward the Company's leadership team for operating and financial results for the year and for adding to and building per share value for our shareholders, measured on both a yearly and long-term horizon. We believe our current program's Company performance metrics are the correct measures that align shareholder interests and executive interests to Company performance over the short-, medium- and long-term horizons.  Because of the unique assets and operating strategies of the Company, we believe it is imperative that its management team be engaged in and manage the Company for a longer horizon than the typical oil and gas company.  Accordingly, our compensation programs and performance metric measurements are structured for that purpose. 

Summary of Current Compensation Program

·

Yearly salaries of our executives  are based on Company and individual results, overall responsibilities of each officer, expertise required in execution of the position and comparable Company ranges,

·

Yearly cash bonus payments are based on achievement of Company operational performance metrics and subjective job responsibility performance goals,

·

Yearly Long-Term Incentive (LTI) restricted equity based compensation is used to motivate achievement of long-range goals of the Company and to reward individual achievement performance over longer-term horizons,

·

Yearly LTI ultimate realization is based on employment longevity (25%) and growth in the per share market price (75%) of the Company's common shares over the vesting period of the restricted stock grants.

Financial and Operating Performance – Fiscal 2013

The following is a listfinancial and operating results outlined below provide additional perspective on Panhandle's fiscal 2013 performance:

·

Net income of $13,960,049, $1.67 per share, increased 89% over 2012.

·

Production of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) increased 22% to 13.0 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe), the largest in Company history.

·

Generated cash from operating activities of $37.4 million in fiscal 2013, well in excess of capital expenditures.

·

Exceeded target amounts on all objective performance metrics for fiscal 2013, except for total general and administrative expenses.

·

Continued to maintain a strong balance sheet with debt to equity at 8.6% on September 30, 2013.

(22)


Information About Our Executive Officers

The current executive officers of the Company.Company are listed below.  All officers hold office at the discretion of the Board and may be removed from office, with or without cause, at any time by the Board.

 

 

 

 

Name

Age

Positions and Offices
Presently Held With the Company

Officer  Since

Michael C. Coffman(1)

60

President and Chief Executive Officer

1990

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.

53

Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

2009

Lonnie J. Lowry

61

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

2006

Ben Spriestersbach

62

Vice President of Land

2005

Robb P. Winfield

39

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

2009

Name

  Age  

Positions and Offices Presently Held

With the Company

  Officer
Since

Michael C. Coffman(1)

  58  President and Chief Executive Officer  1990

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.

  51  Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer  2009

Lonnie J. Lowry

  59  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  2006

Ben Spriestersbach

  60  Vice President of Land  2005

Robb P. Winfield

  37  Controller and Chief Accounting Officer  2009

(1)(1)Biographical information for Mr. Coffman is set forth above in “Election of Directors – Directors Whose Terms End in 2014.”

All officers named above heldin “Election of Directors – Nominees for Election to the same officeBoard of Directors for Three Year Terms Ending in the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Wood Oil Company, until July 1, 2011 when Wood Oil Company was merged into the Company.2017.”

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr. was sole proprietor of a consulting petroleum engineering firm from 2007 to 2008, and served from 1997 to 2007 as Vice President, Mid-Continent Business Unit of Range Resources Corporation (oil and gas exploration and production).  He joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2009.  In March, 2010, he was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.  Mr. Blanchard holds a Bachelors of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering.

Lonnie J. Lowry served as Vice President, Controller and Secretary from March 2006 until August 2007 when he was elected Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.  From 2001 to 2006, he served as Controller of the Company.  He had been Controller of Wood Oil Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma (oil and gas exploration and production) for 15 years when it was acquired by Panhandle in 2001.

Ben Spriestersbach was elected Vice President of Land in 2005.  From 2002 through 2004, he served as Land Manager of the Company.  From 1989 to 2001, he worked for Farmers Union Cooperative Royalty Company (oil and gas royalty company), last serving as assistant secretary-treasurer.  Mr. Spriestersbach is a certified professional land man.

Robb P. Winfield served as Controller from February 2008 to March 2009 when he was elected Controller and Chief Accounting Officer.  Mr. Winfield was employed by Chesapeake Energy Corporation (independent oil and gas company) from 2004 to 2008 as Revenue Coordinator and Supervisor and was employed as an auditor from 1999 to 2004 by Ernst & Young LLP.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Committee and Role of the Board of Directors in Fiscal 2013

(16)


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Committee and Role of the Board of Directors in Fiscal 2011

The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors and has the responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring all facets of the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.  In particular, the Committee’s role is to oversee and recommend to the Board for final approval, the compensation, benefit plans and policies, and, in addition, review, approve and recommend to the Board annually all compensation decisions relating to the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers of the Company.  The Committee reviews the executive

(23)


compensation programs, approvesprogram, recommends compensation levels, and performance metrics, reviews management performance and finalrecommends executive bonus distributions.distributions and restricted stock awards.  The Committee met threefour times during fiscal 2011.2013.  The Committee operates in accordance with its charter which sets forth its powers and responsibilities.  A copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com. www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Under the Committee’s Charter, the Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the executive officers’ compensation, evaluates the executive officers’ performance in light of those goals and objectives and, based on the Committee’s evaluation, recommends to the Board compensation levels for the Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers with the final decision made by the Board.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are to:

·

Attract, and retain and incentivize key executives which are necessary to continue execution of the Company’s unique business strategies involving the ownership, management and use of mineral acreage in an oil and gas exploration and production company.

Motivate and reward individual and Company performance and contributions.

Align the interests of the executives with those of the Company’s unique business strategies including the ownership, management and use of mineral acreage in an oil and gas exploration and production company.

·

Motivate and reward individual and Company performance and contributions.

·

Align the interests of the executives with those of our shareholders.

The principal elements of the executive compensation program are yearly salary, annual cash bonus, restricted stock awards and contributions to the ESOP Plan.  The Company has no employment contracts. Awards of restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Restricted Stock Plan are an integral part of the Company’s compensation program. Awardsprogram as a retention and long-term incentive form of restricted stock, salary, cash bonus and ESOP Plan contributions will becompensation.  The executive compensation program is used to meet the Company’s compensation objectives as follows:

·

Attract and retain key executives, reward the officers who contribute to the Company’s success, and motivate the officers to develop and execute short-term, medium-term and long-term business strategies as well as meet annual goals approved by the Board.

·

Align the interests of the executives with those of the Company’s shareholders.  In fiscal 2013, the Company used allocations of Company stock to the ESOP Plan and awards of restricted stock to align the financial interests of the executives with those of our shareholders and to provide a longer-term incentive form of compensation. 

·

Motivate and reward individual performance and contributions.  The Company’s evaluation of the individual performance of each executive officer affects most aspects of the executive’s compensation.  Market data, individual performance and level of responsibility are considered in determining an executive’s annual salary and are important factors in deciding discretionary cash bonuses. 

·

Financial and operating performances of the Company and the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stockare also key factors in determining compensation.

·

Awards of shares under the Restricted Stock Plan made in December of 2012 and 2013 contain vesting provisions that require both continuing length of service to the Company and market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock.  These provisions further align the structure of management compensation to Company performance and shareholder interests.

(24)


 

Attract and retain key executives, reward the officers who contribute to the Company’s success, and motivate the officers to develop and execute short-term, medium-term and long-term business strategies and goals.

Align the interests of the executives with those of the Company’s shareholders. In fiscal 2011, the Company used allocations of Company stock to the ESOP Plan and awards of restricted stock to align the financial interests of the executives with those of the shareholders and to provide a longer-term incentive form of compensation.

Motivate and reward individual performance and contributions. The Company’s evaluation of the individual performance of each executive officer affects most aspects of the executive’s compensation. Individual performance and level of responsibility are considered in determining an executive’s annual salary and are important factors in deciding discretionary cash bonuses.

Financial and operating performances of the Company and the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock are also key factors in determining compensation.

(17)


Role of Executive Officers

In fiscal 2011,2013, the Compensation Committee and the Board, after receiving input from Longnecker & Associates, the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, made all compensation decisions for the Chief Executive Officer and, after receiving input from the Chief Executive Officer, all other executive officers.  The Compensation Committee and the Board reviewed the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, and afterwards, set his compensation.  Mr. Coffman was not present during these discussions.  The Compensation Committee and the Board, together with the Chief Executive Officer, reviewed the performance of the other executive officers.  The Chief Executive Officer made compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee and the Board with respect to the other executive officers.  Messrs. Blanchard, Lowry, Spriestersbach and Winfield were not present during these discussions.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

In an effort to align our executives’ compensation competitively with the market, the Compensation Committee engaged an outside, independent compensation consultant, Longnecker & Associates, Houston, Texas (“L&A”Longnecker”), to review levels and incentive components of the executives’ compensation for fiscal 2011.2013.  The primary role of L&ALongnecker  was to help identify peer companies and to provide the Compensation Committee with market data and information regarding compensation trends in our industry and to make recommendations regarding base salaries, the design of our incentive programs and executive and director compensation levels.  Our managementManagement does not direct or oversee the retention or activities of L&ALongnecker with respect to ourthe Company’s executive compensation program.  The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate independent compensation consultants and to determine the terms of their retention.

Base Salaries and Annual Cash Bonuses

In December of each year, base salaries of the executive officers are set for the next calendar year and bonuses are determined based on the preceding fiscal year’s (year-end September 30) operational and financial performance.  Base salaries and annual cash bonuses for executive officers are based on the individual’s responsibilities and experience, taking into account, among other factors, the individual’s initiative, contribution to the Company’s overall performance, handling of special projects or events during the year and yearly financial and operating results.results of the Company.  Base salaries for executive officers are reviewed and compared to similar positions in the Company’s industry.  L&A andThe Compensation Committee, with the Boardassistance of Longnecker, selected the following group of “peer companies” for 2011 comparison purposes.purposes in determining compensation during fiscal 2013:  

 

Abraxas Petroleum Corp.

Approach Resources, Inc.

Callon Petroleum Co.

Constellation Energy Partners, LLC

Crimson Exploration Inc.

Dorchester Minerals, L.P.

Double Eagle Petroleum Co.

Approach Resources, Inc.

Gastar Exploration Limited

Callon Petroleum Co.

GeoMet Inc.

Constellation Energy Partners, LLC

Matador Resources Company

Credo Petroleum Corp.

PetroQuest Energy Inc.

Crimson Exploration Inc.

PrimeEnergy Corp.

Dorchester Minerals, L.P.

Warren Resources, Inc.

(25)


Since the Company is not the same size and does not have the complexity of operations as most of the peer companies, the Compensation Committee uses the peer group comparison as a tool while considering allmany other factors. Executive officer salaries are below peer group averages as a whole.

(18)


Base Salaries.  The base salaries of the executive officers are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and future salary adjustments, if any, are recommended to the Board for final approval.  The Compensation Committee and the Board consider various factors, including:

·

overall responsibilities of the executive officers;

·

scope, level of experience and expertise required to successfully execute the executive officer’s position with the Company;

·

demonstrated individual performance of the executive officer; and

·

recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer with respect to other executive officers.

time period over which the executive officer has performed his responsibilities for the Company;

scope, level of experience and experience required to successfully execute the executive officer’s position with the Company;

demonstrated individual performance of the executive officer; and

recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer with respect to other executive officers.

Based on these factors and considerations, in December 2011, the Board established the annual base salary for the Chief Executive Officer at $291,000 for calendar 2012. Calendar 2012 base salaries established for the other executive officers were: Paul F. Blanchard—$270,000; Lonnie J. Lowry—$179,000; Ben Spriestersbach—$145,000; and Robb P. Winfield—$140,600. Salaries for the executive officers in fiscal 20112013 are set forth below in the “Executive Compensation—Compensation - Summary Compensation Table” and were determined by the Board based on the considerations described below.above.  Based on the above factors and considerations, in December 2013, the Board established the annual base salary for the Chief Executive Officer at $310,000 for calendar 2014.  Calendar 2014 base salaries established for the other executive officers were: Paul F. Blanchard - $286,500; Lonnie J. Lowry - $185,700; Ben Spriestersbach - $153,000; and Robb P. Winfield - $151,500. 

Annual Cash Bonuses.  During an annual Company goal-setting process, the Compensation Committee and the full Board approve Company objective performance metrics as well as more subjective performance goals that focus on the manner in which the Company’s  oil and gas business is managed.  These performance metrics are used in determining annual cash bonuses.  For fiscal years 20102013 and 2011,2012, the objective performance metrics addressed earnings per share, general and administration (“G&A”) expense, reserve replacement percentage, McfeMmcfe production, and finding cost per Mcfe.Mcfe and total G&A expense.

The objective performance metrics for fiscal 20112013 and fiscal 20102012 are below:

   Fiscal 2011(1)  Fiscal 2010(2) 

Metric Category

  Floor  Target  Weighting  Floor  Target  Weighting 

Earnings per share(3)

  $0.25   $1.09    14 $0.01   $0.52    14

Reserve replacement percentage

   124  175  29  100  137  22

Mmcfe production

   8,916 Mmcfe    9,629 Mmcfe    14  7.92 Mmcfe    8.42 Mmcfe    14
   Maximum  Target  Weighting  Maximum  Target  Weighting 

Finding cost per Mcfe

  $2.25   $1.60    36 $2.75   $2.25    43

G&A expense per

Mcfe of production(4)

  $6.2 mil   $5.8 mil    7 $0.77   $0.51    7

(1)Once the Floor or Maximum is achieved within each Metric Category, 50% credit is earned, with the remaining 50% to be prorated based on the proportion achieved between the Floor or Maximum and the Target.
(2)Each metric has a graduated scale of achievement from -0- to 100% between the Floor or Maximum and Target amounts which is then applied to the weighting percentage
(3)2011 Earnings per share is net of the tax effected net change during fiscal 2011 in receivables and payables related to derivative contracts.
(4)Fiscal 2011 metric is based on total G&A expense whereas the fiscal 2010 metric was based on G&A expense per Mcfe of production.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2013

Fiscal 2012

Metric Category

Minimum(1)

Target(1)

Weighting

Minimum(1)

Target(1)

Weighting

Earnings per share (1)(3)

$0.50

$0.91

7%

$0.25

$1.05

14%

Reserve replacement percentage (1)

125%

175%

29%

175%

200%

22%

Mmcfe production (1)

10,901

11,430

7%

8,923

9,636

7%

 

Maximum(2)

Target(2)

Weighting

Maximum(2)

Target(2)

Weighting

Finding cost per Mcfe (2)(4)

$1.50

$1.10

50%

$2.25

$1.60

50%

Total G&A expense (2)

$6.7 mil

$6.4 mil

7%

$6.4 mil

$6.0 mil

7%

 

(19)(1)If the Target is achieved in any metric category covered by a Minimum measurement, 100% credit is earned.  If the Minimum is achieved for any of these metric categories and the Target is not achieved, 50% credit is earned, with the remaining 50% based on the proportion achieved between the Minimum and the applicable Target.  If the Minimum is not achieved in a metric category, no credit is earned.

(2)If the Maximum is exceeded for these two metric categories, no credit is received for the affected metric category. If the Target is met for these metric categories, 100% credit is earned.  If the amount achieved is below the Maximum for any of these metric categories and the Target is not achieved, 50% credit is earned, with the remaining 50% based on the proportion achieved between the Maximum and the applicable Target.

(26)


(3)Earnings per share is net of the tax effected net change during the fiscal year in receivables and payables related to derivative contracts.

(4)Finding cost per Mcfe is defined by the Compensation Committee and takes into account only changes in proved developed reserves and utilizes the ratio of SEC reserves oil and NGL prices to SEC reserves natural gas price as the factors to convert oil and NGL reserves to Mcfe reserves.

The Compensation Committee believes that combining the metric categories of growing reserves, increasing Mcfe production, reducing theminimizing finding cost per Mcfe and reducingmanaging G&A expense are the important measurements necessary for increasing shareholder value and to grow an oil and gas exploration and production company.  The target metric of reducingminimizing finding cost per Mcfe is intended to discourage drilling marginal or unprofitable wells only to achieve increased production and reserves.  These metrics have been adopted by the Compensation Committee to focus management on drilling wells that are economically viable.viable and generate a reasonable rate of return for the Company.  The emphasis on the earnings per share metric has the effect of discouraging excessive risk taking.  The Compensation Committee does not believe that these performance metrics reward executives for taking risks beyond those risks inherent in the oil and gas exploration and production business.

The Compensation Committee has the discretion to modify the effect of the objective performance metrics if unforeseen or uncontrollable conditions resulted in any of these metrics not being satisfied.relevant to the Company’s results for the year.

The subjective performance goals are tailored to fit the job description of each executive officer by weighting each major area of responsibility.  Within each major area, a breakdown is made of more detailed areas of responsibility with weighting applied to each.responsibility.  An evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer is performed annually by the Compensation Committee.  The Chief Executive Officer performed the evaluation of each of the other executive officers.  In these evaluations, performances are evaluated on each of the detailed areas of responsibility.  The evaluations are then accumulated to determine the grade for each major area and the area grading is summarized to determine the executive officer’s subjective performance evaluation total score.

The Committee reviewed the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in meeting the Company’sCompanys performance metrics and his subjective performance goals for fiscal 2011.2013.  In addition, the Committee noted that the Company’sCompanys share price had outperformedunderperformed both the S&P Small Cap 600 and the S&P Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Indexes for fiscal 2011.2013.  The Company’sCompanys share price increased 15%decreased 8% during fiscal 2011.2013.  The Committee believes that this underperformance was principally due to the Company being primarily  a natural gas producer which is out‑of‑favor in the marketplace.  Natural gas prices have been depressed for several years but recently have been increasing.  The Committee placed emphasis on the excellent performance metric results while believing the Company’s natural gas assets will provide excellent returns for the Company’s shareholders over a longer horizon.

LOGOIn addition, the Committee considered the unprecedented economic downturn of 2008 and its major negative effect on the stock market which occurred subsequent to the Company’s fiscal 2008.  The market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange at September 30, 2008 was $28.63 per share, as compared to $16.57 per share on December 1, 2008.  As opposed to the mandated five year chart presented below, if a chart was prepared of the share prices comparing the December 1, 2008 price to the December 1, 2013, the chart price would

(27)


compare the $16.57 price mentioned above to a closing price on November 29, 2013 of $33.10 per share.

The graph below matches Panhandle Oil & Gas Inc's cumulative 5-Year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P Smallcap 600 index and the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production index.  The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from 9/30/2008 to 9/30/2013.

Picture 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/08

9/09

9/10

9/11

9/12

9/13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Panhandle Oil & Gas Inc

100.00 
75.70 
88.52 
102.73 
112.10 
104.39 

S&P Smallcap 600

100.00 
89.39 
102.10 
102.31 
136.43 
179.43 

S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

100.00 
94.64 
93.90 
89.75 
108.55 
137.89 

(20)


The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

The Compensation Committee believes that the cash bonus element of compensation for Mr. Coffman, Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Blanchard, Chief Operating Officer, should principally reflect their success in achieving the above outlined Company performance metrics.  Their bonus calculation is based on a weighting of 70% for meeting the objective performance metrics and 30% for meeting their subjective performance goals.

(28)


Cash bonuses are paid in the first fiscal quarter (December) of each year based on the preceding fiscal year’s metric results.  Thus, bonuses paidawarded in fiscal 2013 (paid in December 20102012) were based on the following fiscal 20102012 metric results. For fiscal 2010, the metric results were as follows:

Fiscal 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Metric Category

Actual Results

Target

Earnings per share

$

0.91 

$

1.05 

Reserve replacement percentage

 

223% 

 

200% 

Mmcfe production

 

10,583 

 

9,636 

Finding cost per Mcfe

$

1.53 

$

1.60 

Total G&A expense

$

6.4 mil

$

6.0 mil

 

Metric Category

Actual Results

Earnings per share

$1.36

Reserve replacement percentage

505%

Mmcfe production

8,927 Mmcfe

Findings cost per Mcfe

$0.29

G&A expense per Mcfe of production

$0.59

The maximum targeted annual cash bonus that could have been paid in December 20102012 to the Chief Executive Officer (based on fiscal 20102012 results) was 100% of his $291,000 base salary ($260,000).salary.  The maximum targeted annual cash bonus that could have been paid in December 20102012 to the Chief Operating Officer (based on fiscal 20102012 results) was 75% of his $270,000 base salary ($240,000).salary.  The other executive officers’ annual bonuses were targeted at 30% of base salaries and were based 80% on meeting subjective performance goals and 20% on meeting Company objective performance metrics.

Cash bonus payments made during the first fiscal quarter of 20112013 (December 2010)2012) are set forth below in the Summary“Summary Compensation TableTable” under “Executive Compensation”.

Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation

Our executive officers are eligible to receive stock-based awards under our Restricted Stock Plan.  The objectives of the Restricted Stock Plan are to attract and retain key employees, to motivate them to achieve long-range goals and to reward individual performance.  Because executives’ compensation from stock-based awards is heavily weighted to our stock price performance, the Compensation Committee believes stock-based awards create a strong incentive to improve long-term financial performance and increase shareholder value.  Factors used to set the range of stock-based awards include management’s and the Compensation Committee’s perception of the incentive necessary to motivate individuals to join the Company and the role and impact of the various management levels in achieving key strategic results.  Awards made to executive officers in fiscal 2013 consisted entirely of restricted stock awards which were made under the Restricted Stock Plan. 

Vesting provisions contained in the stock restriction agreements for restricted stock awards are used by the Compensation Committee as another method to tie executive compensation both to continuing service by the executive to the Company and to the growth in shareholder value, as measured by the market price of the Company’s shares.  Under various circumstances, the restricted stock awards may vest totally, partially or not at all.

A portion of these restricted stock awards vest if the executive officers remain employees of the Company for the vesting period.  These time vested stock awards are forfeited if the officer does not remain employed for the vesting period.  The Compensation Committee believes a  three-year vesting schedule for restricted stock awards enhances the retention value of these awards and positions the Company competitively from a market perspective.  For a description of the stock-

(29)


based awards under the Restricted Stock Plan, see the table entitled “Outstanding Restricted Stock Awards” on page 16.

Longnecker reviewed the total direct compensation packages of our executives, including our stock-based award program and recommended the Committee consider maintaining the use of restricted stock awards.  The Compensation Committee relied upon the market data, company performance, and individual performance in the determination of stock-based awards for our executive officers.  After considering all of these factors, in fiscal 2013, our committee approved the following restricted stock awards, which vest over a three year period:  Michael C. Coffman, 13,361 shares; Paul F. Blanchard, 10,476 shares; Lonnie J. Lowry, 935 shares; Ben Spriestersbach, 1,285 shares; and Robb P. Winfield, 748 shares.

Clawback Policy

The Companys clawback policy further aligns the interests of our executives with shareholders.  Under our clawback policy, our Board may reduce or cancel, or require recovery of, any incentive-based compensation from current or former executives if the Company has to issue an accounting restatement based on erroneous data due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under federal securities laws that affect directly or indirectly the objective and subjective metrics used to determine bonuses and restricted stock awards.

Broad-Based Employee Benefits

Broad-Based Employee Benefits

·

The Company’s ESOP Plan is a tax-qualified, defined contribution plan that covers all employees, including the executive officers.  Under the ESOP Plan, the Company contributes shares of its Common Stock to the ESOP Plan based on the employees’ total compensation level.

·

All employees, including the executive officers, are eligible to participate on the same basis in all of the Company’s other employee benefit plans which include medical, dental, group life, long term disability, accidental death and dismemberment and eye care insurance.

·

The Company provides no perquisites or other personal benefits to its executive officers.

The Company’s ESOP Plan is a tax-qualified, defined contribution plan that covers all employees, including the executive officers. Under the ESOP Plan, the Company contributes shares of Common Stock to the ESOP Plan based on the employees’ total compensation level.

All employees, including the executive officers, are eligible to participate on the same basis in all of the Company’s other employee benefit plans which include medical, dental, group life, long term disability, accidental death and dismemberment and eye care insurance.

The Company provides no perquisites or other personal benefits to its executive officers.

(21)


Change-In-Control Executive Severance Agreements

The Board believes that the executives’ performance generally may be hampered by distraction, uncertainty and other activities in the event of a change-in-control of the Company which might adversely affect shareholder values.  To reduce these potential adverse effects and to encourage fair treatment of the executive officers in connection with any change-in-control event, Change-In-Control Executive Severance Agreements were entered into in 2007 with the executive officers to provide for change-in-control protection.  Under these Agreements, if, within two years following a change-in-control event, the Company terminates the employment of any of the executives without cause, or any executive resigns for good reason, that executive would be entitled to a severance payment, payable in a lump sum, in cash, following his termination, in an amount equal to two times the average of the compensation paid to the executive during the two calendar years preceding the change-in-control event (or the annual average of any shorter period).  Compensation for this purpose includes the sum of the executive’s base salary, cash bonuses and

(30)


contributions made to the ESOP on executive’s behalf.  The bonus to beamount used in determining the executive’s compensation shall not be less than two times his targeted bonus for the calendar year in which the change-in-control event occurs (or if not yet determined for that year, two times the executive’s targeted bonus for the preceding calendar year).  Further, if the executive qualifies, and the Company is required to provide coverage under COBRA, the Company shall reimburse the executive the costs of purchasing continuing coverage under COBRA for the executive and his dependents for as long as he qualifies for COBRA coverage.  The Company ishas not currentlybeen subject to COBRA because it hashad had fewer than 20 employees.employees; however, the Company did reach 20 employees during the latter half of calendar 2012.  The Company became subject to COBRA on January 1, 2014.

A change-in-control event generally means: (i) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the Company’s Common Stock; (ii) during any two consecutive years, individuals who currently make up the Company’s Board (or which subsequently become directors after being approved for election by at least a majority of current directors) ceasing for any reason to make up at least two-thirds of the Board; or (iii) approval by the Company’s shareholders of (a) a reorganization, merger or consolidation which results in the ownership of 20% or more of the Company’s Common Stock by persons or entities that were not previously shareholders, (b) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company, or (c) the sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets.

There may arise situations where the potential to merge with or be acquired by another company may be in the best interest of our shareholders.  Based on this potential, the Company believes that the “double trigger” requiring both (i) a change-in-control event and (ii) the termination of an executive’s employment without cause or his resignation for good reason is appropriate to provide fair treatment of the executive officers, while allowing them to continue to concentrate on enhancing shareholder value during a change-in-control event, as they may take actions which ultimately may lead to their termination after the change-in-control event.

Pursuant to the Change-In-Control Executive Severance Agreements, assuming that a change-in-control event took place on the last business day of fiscal 2011,2013, and an executive’s employment was terminated without cause, or the executive terminated his employment for good reason, within two years following this assumed change-in-control event, the executives below would receive the following severance payments:

 

 

 

 

Name

Salary(1)

Bonus(2)

Total(3)

Michael C. Coffman

$641,000

$600,000

$1,241,000

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.

$600,000

$417,000

$1,017,000

Lonnie J. Lowry

$419,050

$109,200

$528,250

Ben Spriestersbach

$335,777

$90,000

$425,777

Robb P. Winfield

$329,006

$87,360

$416,366

(1)Calculated based on (i) two times the average of the executive officer’s base salary during calendar years 2011 and 2012 plus (ii) two times the average amount contributed to the ESOP on behalf of each executive for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

(2)Calculated based on two times the maximum targeted bonus for each executive for calendar year 2013.

(3)In addition, if the Company is required to provide continuing coverage to its employees under COBRA (as defined in Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) at the time of a change-in-control, the Company will reimburse each executive for all costs incurred by him in purchasing such continuing coverage for himself and his dependents as long as he qualifies for COBRA coverage.

(31)


 

(22)


Name

  Salary(1)   Bonus(2)   Total(3) 

Michael C. Coffman

  $608,500    $550,000    $1,158,000  

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.

  $568,500    $382,500    $951,000  

Lonni J. Lowry

  $397,843    $103,200    $501,043  

Ben Spriestersbach

  $314,272    $81,000    $395,272  

Robb P. Winfield

  $310,673    $80,400    $391,073  

(1)Calculated based on (i) two times the average of the executive officer’s base salary during calendar years 2010 and 2011 plus (ii) two times the average amount contributed to the ESOP on behalf of each executive for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
(2)Calculated based on two times the maximum targeted bonus for each executive for fiscal year 2011.
(3)In addition, if the Company is required to provide continuing coverage to its employees under COBRA (as defined in Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) at the time of a change-in-control, the Company will reimburse each executive for all costs incurred by him in purchasing such continuing coverage for himself and his dependents as long as he qualifies for COBRA coverage.

Other than the Change-In-Control Executive Severance Agreements, the Company maintains no employment agreements with its executive officers.

Other Compensation Matters

The Company currently does not have ownership requirements or a stock retention policy for our executive officers.  The Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Practices prohibits directors, officers and employees from engaging in speculative transactions involving the Company’s securities.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 annually paid to any of our executive officers, unless the compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation.  As our compensation levels are well below this level, Section 162(m) is a non-factor for the Company.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company has weathered the ongoing economic conditions in an excellent manner and, to the best of its knowledge, has no upcoming issues.  The Company is mindful of the current state of the economy and will continue to evaluate its situation and the potential effects on executive compensation.

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

Darryl G. Smette—Smette – Chair

            Bruce M. Bell

            E. Chris Kauffman

Robert O. Lorenz

Robert E. Robotti

H. Grant Swartzwelder

(23)


Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The table below sets forth information for the three most recently completed fiscal years concerning compensation paid to executive officers in those fiscal years for services in all capacities.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

Fiscal Year

Base Salary (1)

Cash Bonus (1)

Stock Awards (2)

All Other Compen-sation

Total

Three Year Average

Michael C. Coffman President and Chief Executive Officer

2013 
$
297,750 

$303,289(4)

$
249,602 

$48,167(5)

$
898,808 

 

2012 
$
287,000 

$293,777(4)

$
269,616 

$44,032(5)

$
894,425 

 

2011 
$
271,250 

$277,119(4)

$
233,461 

$40,076(5)

$
821,906 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
871,713 

(32)


 

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

Fiscal Year

Base Salary (1)

Cash Bonus (1)

Stock Awards (2)

All Other Compen-sation

Total

Three Year Average

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.,

Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

2013 
$
276,000 

$218,784(6)

$
195,709 

$46,317(7)

$
736,810 

 

2012 
$
266,250 

$202,838(6)

$
211,701 

$43,196(7)

$
723,985 

 

2011 
$
251,250 

$195,866(6)

$
184,015 

$39,928(7)

$
671,059 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
710,618 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lonnie J. Lowry, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

2013 
$
181,250 
$
48,392 
$
17,470 

$35,317(8)

$
282,429 

 

2012 
$
177,250 
$
46,777 
$
19,140 

$34,067(8)

$
277,234 

 

2011 
$
169,800 
$
45,304 

--

$32,550(8)

$
247,654 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
269,106 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ben Spriestersbach, Vice President of Land

2013 
$
148,750 
$
41,779 
$
24,002 

$30,032(9)

$
244,563 

 

2012 
$
142,500 
$
38,820 
$
15,491 

$27,779(9)

$
224,590 

 

2011 
$
133,625 
$
36,104 

--

$25,743(9)

$
195.472 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
221,542 

Robb P. Winfield Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

2013 
$
144,350 
$
40,872 
$
13,974 

$28,235(10)

$
227,431 

 

2012 
$
138,950 
$
38,538 
$
15,022 

$26,822(10)

$
219,332 

 

2011 
$
132,375 
$
36,170 

--

$25,341(10)

$
193,886 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
213,550 

At

(1)

Base salaries are set on a calendar year basis and are reported on a fiscal year basis ending on September 30 of each year. This means that the 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting, shareholders cast advisory votes on approvalsalary shown above for each fiscal year reported represents three months’ salary of the Company’s executive compensation programprevious calendar year and on whether shareholders should vote on executive compensation every three years, two years or one year. More than 93%the first nine months of Shares castthe current calendar year through September 30 fiscal year-end. Cash bonuses are paid in December of each year based on the matter supportedpreceding fiscal year’s performance. Bonuses shown for fiscal 2013 were paid in December 2012 and were based on fiscal 2012 financial and operating performance. The same timing of payments and Company performance holds true for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.  

(2)

In accordance with applicable accounting standards, these amounts represent the Company’s executive compensation program. More than 64%aggregate fair value of Shares castthe awards on the matter supported a shareholder vote every three yearsaward date. The ultimate value realized by the executive officers on approvalvesting of the executive compensation program. Basedawards may or may not equal the fair market value at award date based on this vote,failure to achieve the Board has determinedspecified vesting requirements. Under certain circumstances, the awards may wholly or partially vest or never vest.  See footnotes (2), (4) and (6) to present the executive compensation programtable entitled “Outstanding Restricted Stock Awards at 2013 Fiscal Year-End” under “Restricted Stock Plan” above in Proposal No.3.

(3)

Includes premiums of immaterial amounts for shareholder approval every three years. The next shareholder vote will occur at the 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting.

Executive Compensation

The table below sets forth informationgroup life insurance for the three most recently completed fiscal years concerning compensation paid to executive officers2013, 2012 and 2011.

(4)

Included in thoseMr. Coffman’s cash bonuses are performance bonuses (based on each fiscal years for services in all capacities.

yearSummary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal Position

  Fiscal
Year
   Base
Salary(1)
  Cash
Bonus(1)
  Stock
Awards(2)
   All Other
Compen-
sation(3)
  Total   Three
Year
Average
 

Michael C. Coffman,

   2011    $271,250   $277,119(4)  $233,461    $40,076(5)  $821,906    

President and Chief

   2010    $255,000   $111,263(4)  $99,050    $37,769(5)  $503,082    

Executive Officer

   2009    $236,250   $250,504(4)   —      $35,274(5)  $522,028    
           $615,672  

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.,

   2011    $251,250   $195,866(6)  $184,015    $39,928(7)  $671,059    

Sr. Vice President and

   2010    $235,000   $110,750   $141,500    $37,311(7)  $524,561    

Chief Operating

   2009    $150,897(8)   —      —       —     $150,897    

Officer

           
           $448,839  

Lonnie J. Lowry,

   2011    $169,800   $45,304    —      $32,550(9)  $247,654    

Vice President, Chief

   2010    $162,400   $40,110    —      $30,661(9)  $233,171    

Financial Officer and

   2009    $156,250   $42,075    —      $30,033(9)  $228,358    

Secretary

           
           $236,394  

Ben Spriestersbach,

   2011    $133,625   $36,104    —      $25,743(10)  $195.472    

Vice President, of

   2010    $128,875   $33,211    —      $24,835(10)  $186,921    

Land

   2009    $125,750   $34,422     $24,398(10)  $184,570    
       —         $188,988  

Robb P. Winfield,(11)

   2011    $132,375   $36,170    —      $25,341(12)  $193,886    

Controller and Chief

   2010    $126,875   $32,400    —      $23,987(12)  $183,262    

Accounting Officer

   2009    $121,667   $32,490    —      $23,196(12)  $177,353    
           $184,834  

(1)Salaries are set on a calendar year basis and are reported on a fiscal year basis ending on September 30 of each year. This means that the salary shown above for each fiscal year reported represents three months’ salary of the previous calendar year and the first nine months of the current calendar year. Cash bonuses are paid in December of each year based on the preceding fiscal year’s performance. Bonuses shown for fiscal 2011 were paid in December 2010 and were based on fiscal 2010 financial and operating performance. The same timing of payments and Company performance holds true for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008.
(2)In accordance with applicable accounting standards, these amounts represent the aggregate fair value of the awards on the grant date. The ultimate value realized by the executive officers on vesting of the awards may or may not equal the fair market value at grant date. See the “Outstanding Restricted Stock Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year-End” table below.
(3)Includes premiums of immaterial amounts for group life insurance for fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009.

(24)


(4)Included in Mr. Coffman’s cash bonuses are performance bonuses (based on each fiscal year’ss financial and operating performance and subjective performance goals) and supplemental payments for the portion of his earned ESOP contribution which could not be made due to the deferral maximum regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. The performance bonuses paid in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $258,180, $72,000 and $225,000, respectively. The supplemental payments in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $18,189, $38,513 and $24,754, respectively.
(5)Represents the value of 1,295 shares for fiscal 2011, 1,488 shares for fiscal 2010 and 1,615 shares for fiscal 2009 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Coffman’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year.
(6)Included in Mr. Blanchard’s fiscal 2011 cash bonuses is a performance bonus (based on fiscal 2010 financial and operating performance and subjective performance goals) and supplemental payments for the portion of his earned ESOP contribution which could not be made due to the deferral maximum regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. The performance bonus paid in fiscal 2011 was $180,000. The supplemental payment in fiscal 2011 was $15,116.
(7)Represents the value of 1,295 shares for fiscal 2011 and 1,488 shares for fiscal 2010 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Blanchard’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of the fiscal year. Because Mr. Blanchard joined the Company January 26, 2009, he received no bonus in fiscal 2009 and was not eligible for an ESOP contribution for fiscal 2009.
(8)Since Mr. Blanchard began employment at the Company during January 2009, his fiscal 2009 base salary represents compensation for approximately eight months.
(9)Represents the value of 1,137 shares for fiscal 2011, 1,230 shares for fiscal 2010 and 1,392 shares for fiscal 2009 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Lowry’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year.
(10)Represents the value of 897 shares for fiscal 2011, 984 shares for fiscal 2010 and 1,124 shares for fiscal 2009 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Spriestersbach’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year.
(11)Mr. Winfield was named an executive officer effective March 5, 2009.
(12)Represents the value of 891 shares for fiscal 2011, 967 shares for fiscal 2010 and 1,082 shares for fiscal 2009 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Winfield’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of the fiscal year.

The Company’s only equity incentive plans for its executive officers are the ESOP Plan and the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan described below.

ESOP Plan

The ESOP Plan is a tax-qualified, defined contribution plan, and serves as the Company’s only retirement plan for its employees. Contributions are made at the discretion of the Board and, to date, all contributions have been made in shares of Common Stock. Contributions are allocated to all participants in proportion to their compensation for the plan year and 100% vesting occurs after three years of service. Separation prior to three years of service results in forfeiture of all contributions received. All employees, including the executive officers, may participate in the 401(k) portion of the ESOP Plan on a voluntary basis. Under the terms of the 401(k) portion of the ESOP Plan, eligible employees may elect to defer a portion of their earnings up to the maximum allowed by regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. The performance bonuses paid in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $259,339, $250,250 and $258,180, respectively. The supplemental payments in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $43,200, $42,777 and $18,189, respectively.

(5)

Represents the value of 1,326 shares for fiscal 2013, 1,222 shares for fiscal 2012 and 1,295 shares for fiscal 2011, of Company makes no matching contributionsstock contributed to the 401(k) portion ofESOP on Mr. Coffman’s behalf based on the ESOP Plan.

2010 Restricted Stock Plan

Awards.     The 2010 Restricted Stock Plan permits the grant of shares of restricted stock to Company officers and is used by the Compensation Committee for long-term incentive compensation. The Company will sell shares of restricted stock to officers at a significant discount to the fairclosing market valueprice of the shares generally aton the parlast day of each fiscal year and dividends received from restricted stock awards of $9,893, $6,248 and $3,042 for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(6)

Included in Mr. Blanchards cash bonuses are performance bonuses (based on each fiscal year’s financial and operating performance and subjective performance goals) and supplemental payments for the portion of his earned ESOP contribution which could not be made due to the deferral maximum regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. The performance bonuses paid in fiscal years 2013,  2012 and 2011 were $189,378, $174,038 and $180,000, respectively. The supplemental payments in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $28,656, $28,050 and $15,116, respectively.

(7)

Represents the value of 1,326 shares for fiscal 2013, 1,222 shares for fiscal 2012 and 1,295 shares for fiscal 2011 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Blanchard’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year and dividends received from restricted stock awards of $8,403, $5,544 and $3,026 for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(8)

Represents the value of 1,218 shares for fiscal 2013, 1,095 shares for fiscal 2012 and 1,137 shares for fiscal 2011 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Lowry’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year and dividends received from restricted stock awards of $435 and $179 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(9)

Represents the value of 1,010 shares for fiscal 2013, 886 shares for fiscal 2012 and 897 shares for fiscal 2011 of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Spriestersbach’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year and dividends received from restricted stock awards of $463 and $145 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(33)


(10)Represents the value of 982 shares for fiscal 2013, 868 shares for fiscal 2012 and 891 shares for fiscal 2011, of Company stock contributed to the ESOP on Mr. Winfield’s behalf based on the closing market price of the shares on the last day of each fiscal year and dividends received from restricted stock awards of $344 and $140 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company’s only equity incentive plans for its executive officers are the ESOP Plan discussed below and the Restricted Stock Plan described above in Proposal No. 3.

ESOP Plan

The ESOP Plan is a tax-qualified, defined contribution plan, and serves as the Company’s only retirement plan for its employees.  Contributions are made at the discretion of the Board and, to date, all contributions have been made in shares of Common Stock.  Contributions are allocated to all participants in proportion to their compensation for the plan year and 100% vesting occurs after three years of service.  Separation prior to three years of service results in forfeiture of all contributions received.  All employees, including the executive officers, may participate in the 401(k) portion of the ESOP Plan on a voluntary basis.  Under the terms of the 401(k) portion of the ESOP Plan, eligible employees may elect to defer a portion of their earnings up to the maximum allowed by regulations of the Internal Revenue Service.  The Company makes no matching contributions to the 401(k) portion of the ESOP Plan.  

Proposal No. 6
Advisory Vote to Determine Frequency of Future Advisory
Votes on Executive Compensation

At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board recommended and the shareholders approved that the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation should occur every three years.  The Board has subsequently determined that a vote every year on executive compensation is a better and more accepted approach and is consistent with current thought on good corporate governance practices. 

In recognition of the above, the Board urges shareholders to approve an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.

Although the vote is non-binding, our Board of Directors will take into account the outcome of the vote when making future decisions about the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures.  The Company’s shareholders also have the opportunity to provide additional feedback on important other matters involving executive compensation.   For example, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange require the Company to seek shareholder approval for new employee equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto.  This is the reason the Company is seeking shareholder approval of the amendment to the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan set forth in Proposal 3.  As discussed below under “Communications with the Board of Directors”, the Company provides shareholders an opportunity to communicate directly with the Board, including issues abut executive compensation.

Because the vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board or the Compensation Committee and neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal.  The Compensation Committee will

(34)


carefully consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote
“FOR”
an Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation Every Year

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Based on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we know that the following shareholders are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2013. Robert E. Robotti, a director of the Company, also owns beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock which ownership is set forth above in Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” on page 7.

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

Amount of Shares

Beneficially Owned

Percent of

Common Stock

BlackRock, Inc.
40 E. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022

431,767(1)

5.2%

Amica Mutual Insurance Company
100 Amica Way
Lincoln, RI 02965

550,492(2)

6.7%

(1)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC in  February 2013.

(2)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC in February 2013.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Common Stock, and to furnish the Company with copies of such reports.  Based on a review of the filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and representations that no other reports were filed, the Company believes that during fiscal 2013 all directors and executive officers complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a), with the exception of Duke R.  Ligon who filed a late report on September 9, 2013 relating to 514 shares purchased on June 13, 2013, and Darryl G. Smette who filed a late report on September 9, 2013 relating to 4 shares purchased on June 13, 2013.  These purchases were made through a dividend reinvestment program conducted by the broker holding their shares.

Communications with the Board of Directors

The Company provides an informal process for shareholders and other interested parties to send communications to its Board.  Shareholders or other interested parties who wish to contact the Lead Independent Director, the outside directors as a group, or any of its individual members may do so by writing: Board of Directors, Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc., 5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73112-5688.  Correspondence directed to any individual Board

(35)


member is referred, unopened, to that member.  Correspondence not directed to a particular Board member is referred, unopened, to the Lead Independent Director.

Shareholder Proposals

Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the next annual shareholders meeting to be held in March 2015, and to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, must be received by the Company by October 1, 2014.  Any such proposals should be in writing and be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Company’s office at the address shown below under the caption “Form 10‑K”, Attention: Secretary.  On receipt of any such proposal, the Company will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the proxy statement and any proxy card in accordance with regulations governing the solicitation of proxies.

Under the Company’s Bylaws, in order for a shareholder to nominate a candidate for director, or propose other business to be considered by shareholders, timely notice of the nomination or the other business proposed must be received by the Company in advance of the annual meeting.  Ordinarily, such notice must be received not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the mailing of notice for the preceding year’s  annual shareholders meeting.  The shareholder filing the notice of nomination must describe various matters regarding the nominee, including, but not limited to, such information as name, address, occupation, business background and shares held, and the nominee must deliver a written questionnaire and agreement to the Company covering certain matters as specified in the Bylaws.  In order for a shareholder to bring other business before a shareholders’ meeting, timely notice must be received by the Company within the time limits described above in this paragraph for notice of nomination of a candidate for director.  Such notice must include a description of the proposed business, the reasons therefor, and other specified matters.  These requirements are separate from the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

In each case, the notice must be given to the Secretary of the Company at the address shown below under the caption “Form 10-K”.  Any shareholder desiring a copy of the Company’s Bylaws will be furnished one without charge on written request to the Secretary.  A copy of the Bylaws is available on the Company’s  website at www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

The Company’s Bylaws were amended on December 11, 2013 to provide access to the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card for director elections to eligible shareholders who wish to nominate a person for election to the Company’s Board of Directors.  To be eligible to access the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card for this purpose, a shareholder, together with its affiliates, must have held beneficial ownership of 5% of the Company’s common stock for at least one year prior to providing notice to the Company seeking access to its proxy statement.  Notice from a shareholder seeking such access must be received by the Company in the same time period required for shareholders seeking to nominate directors to the Company’s Board of Directors.  Only one seat on the Board may be held by a person elected as a director resulting from a shareholders use of these proxy access Bylaw provisions.  A shareholder seeking access to the Company’s proxy statement shall provide all information required from a shareholder seeking to nominate a director as well as undertakings signed by the shareholder and the proposed nominee.  The Bylaw provision

(36)


is the exclusive means for shareholders to include nominees for a director in the Company proxy statement and proxy card.

A shareholder seeking access to the Company’s proxy statement shall provide all information required from a shareholder seeking to nominate a director as well as undertaking signed by the shareholder and the proposed nominee.  This Bylaw provision is the exclusive means for shareholders to include nominees for director in the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card.

Annual Report to Shareholders

Copies of the Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal 2013 are being mailed with this proxy statement and a copy of the Annual Report is available on the Company’s website at: www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Form 10-K

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is included in the Annual Report to Shareholders mailed with this proxy statement.  A separate Form 10-K and copies of the Company’s charters for the various committees of the Board, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Company’s codes of ethics are available, free of charge, on written or oral request made to the Company at the address or telephone number set forth below, or can be viewed at the Company’s website: www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300

Oklahoma City, OK  73112-5688

405.948.1560

(37)


Other Matters

Management knows of no other matters to be brought before the meeting.  However, if any other matters do properly come before the meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by the proxies in the accompanying form will be voted as the Board may recommend.  Whether shareholders plan to attend the meeting or not, they are respectfully urged to mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy, which will be returned to them at the meeting if they are present and so request.

By Order of the Board of Directors

January 28, 2014Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

Whether Or Not You Expect To Attend The Annual Meeting, Please Mark, Sign And Date The Enclosed Proxy And Mail It Promptly In The Postage-Paid Envelope Provided.

If Your Shares Are Held By A Broker Or Other Nominee, Please Provide Specific Voting Instructions To The Broker Or Nominee So Your Shares Can Be Voted at the Annual Meeting.

(38)


(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)


APPENDIX A


PANHANDLE OIL AND GAS INC.

AMENDED

2010 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN

March 5, 2014


APPENDIX A, Page 1 of 8


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 1. Introduction

3

1.1.Purpose of the Plan

3

1.2.Nature of Sales of Restricted Stock

3

1.3.Effective Date and Term of Plan

3

Section 2. Definitions And Construction

3

2.1.Definitions

3

2.2.Construction

4

Section 3. Eligibility

4

3.1.In General

4

Section 4. Administration Of The restricted sharesPlan

4

4.1.In General

4

Section 5. Shares Subject To The Plan

5

5.1.Number of Shares

5

Section 6. Restricted Stock

5

6.1.Sale of Restricted Stock

5

6.2.The Restricted Period

5

6.3.Escrow

5

6.4.Dividends

6

6.5.Repurchase of Restricted Stock

6

6.6.Expiration of Restricted Period

6

6.7.Rights as a Shareholder

6

Section 7. Adjustments

6

7.1.Changes in Capitalization

6

Section 8. Change In Control

6

8.1.Consequences of a Change In Control on Restricted Stock

6

8.2.Change In Control Defined

7

Section 9. General Provisions

7

9.1.Transferability of Restricted Stock

7

9.2.Termination of Status

7

9.3.Withholding

7

9.4.Other Conditions on Delivery of Stock

8

Section 10. Miscellaneous

8

10.1.No Right to Continued Employment

8

10.2.Amendment

8

10.3.Compliance with Code Section 409A

8

10.4.Governing Law

8

PANHANDLE OIL AND GAS INC.

AMENDED

2010 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN

Section 1. Introduction

1.1.Purpose of the Plan.The Plan provides an essential long-term component to the Company’s total compensation package for its officers and directors reflecting the importance the Company places on aligning the interest of its officers and directors with those of its shareholders and provides incentives for officers and directors to remain with the Company.The Plan will vest afterenhance the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate officers and directors of the Company.

1.2.Nature of Sales of Restricted Stock.The Plan is intended to permit the Sale by the Company of Shares of Restricted Stock to its officers and directors subject to various vesting based on the passage of time (typically over several yearsor other conditions to vesting and other restrictions on the anniversary datestransferability of the issuance of the restricted stock) and vesting may alsoShares sold.  The transfer restrictions on these Shares will be subject to the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock. The minimum vesting period is two years but is expected to be three to five years. The Company will repurchase the restricted stock at the original purchase price if vesting does not occur.

(25)


Officers participate in this programremoved based on their (i) ability to make a significant contribution to the Company’s financial and operating results, (ii) level of responsibility, and (iii) performance. No officer is entitled to participate automatically based on title, position or salary level. This program is designed to help retain key officers ofvesting restrictions contained in the Stock Restriction Agreement between the Company and participation willthe affected Participant.  Except as otherwise provided by the Plan, each Sale hereunder may be highly selective.

Each participantmade alone or in the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan enters into a stock restriction agreement with the Company setting forth theaddition or in relation to any other Sale.  The terms conditionsof each Sale need not be identical, and restrictions of the restricted stock grant. The restricted stock is issued in the name of the participant and deposited with the Company, or an escrow agent determined by the Compensation Committee until the restrictions lapse or until vesting is no longer possible under the stock restriction agreement.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the stock restriction agreement, a participant holding restricted stock has the right to receive dividends on the shares of restricted stock during the restriction period, vote the restricted stock and enjoy other shareholder rights related to the restricted stock. On expiration of the restriction period, subject to the terms of the Plan and the stock restriction agreement, the participant will be entitled to receive shares of Common Stockneed not subject to restriction.treat Participants uniformly.

1.3.Effective Date and Term of Plan.  The 2010 Restricted StockIf approved by shareholders at the Company’s 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the Plan waswill be effective onas of March 11, 2010.5, 2014. No restricted stock cansales to Participants shall be awardedpermitted under the Plan after the day before the tenth anniversary of the effective date,March 5, 2024 but the vesting periods for restricted stockShares previously sold may extend beyond that date.

Section 2. Definitions And Construction

2.1.Definitions.    When used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, unless the context clearly requires a different meaning:

(a)

“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(b)

“Change in Control”shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.2.

(c)

“Code”means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(d)

“Common Stock” means the Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01666 per share.

(e)

“Company”means Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

(f)

“Compensation Committee”shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board.

(g)

“Disability” shall mean incapacity due to physical or mental illness as determined by the Compensation Committee.

(h)

“Effective Date”means the first date set forth in Section 1.3.

APPENDIX A, Page 3 of 8


(i)

“Fair Market Value” means the closing sales price (for the primary trading session) of a Share on the date the Restricted Period ends.  For any date that is not a trading day, the Fair Market Value of a Share for such date will be determined by using the closing sales price for the immediately preceding trading day.

(j)

“Participant” means any officer or director who purchases Restricted Stock.

(k)

“Plan”means this Amended 2010 Restricted Stock Plan.

(l)

“Repurchase” shall have the meaning as set forth in Section 6.5.

(m)

“Restricted Period”means the period of time during which the transfer of the Shares of Restricted Stock shall be restricted and after which the shares of Restricted Stock shall be vested.

(n)

“Restricted Stock”means Shares sold under this Plan.

(o)

“Sale”means a sale of shares of Restricted Stock made under the Plan.

(p)

“Share” means a share of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01666 per share, of the Company.

(q)

“Stock Restriction Agreement”means all agreements between the Company and a Participant covering the Sale of Restricted Stock under this Plan.

2.2.Construction.    When used in the Plan, (a) the terms “include” and “including” shall be deemed to include the phrase “but not limited to” and (b) masculine pronouns shall include the feminine.

Section 3. Eligibility

3.1.In General.Any natural person is eligible to purchase Restricted Stock if such individual is a current officer or director of the Company or any of the Company’s present or future subsidiary entities in which the Company has a controlling interest, as determined by the Compensation Committee, are eligible toCommittee.

Section 4. Administration Of The Plan

4.1.In General.

(a)

The Plan will be granted an award of restricted stock.

Administration.     The 2010 Restricted Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which has authority to grant awards of restricted stock and determine recipients and the terms of awards.Committee.  The Compensation Committee hasshall have authority to determine the Participants and terms and conditions of any Sale of Restricted Stock, and to adopt, amend and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices relating to the Plan as it shall deem advisable.

(b)

The Compensation Committee shall have full discretionary authority to construe and interpret the terms of the 2010 RestrictedPlan and any Stock PlanRestriction Agreement, and to determine all facts necessary to administer the Plan.Plan and any Stock Restriction Agreement.  The Compensation Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Stock Restriction Agreement in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or advisable.

APPENDIX A, Page 4 of 8


(c)

All decisions by the Compensation Committee shall be made in its sole discretion and shall be final and binding on all persons having or claiming any interest in the Plan or in any purchase of Restricted Stock.  No director or person acting pursuant to the authority delegated by the Compensation Committee shall be liable for any action or determination relating to or under the Plan made in good faith.

Section 5. Shares Subject To The Plan

Stock 5.1.Number of Shares.

(a)

Subject to the 2010adjustment under Section 7.1, Sales of Restricted Stock Plan.     Subject to adjustments allowed under the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan, awards of restricted stock may be made under the Plan for up to 100,000 shares250,000 Shares.

(b)

If Shares sold hereunder are repurchased by the Company prior to the vesting of Common Stock. If any award of restricted stock expires or is terminated, surrendered or canceled without being fully vested,such Shares the unused shares covered by such award willrepurchased Shares shall again be available for grantssale by the Company to officers under the Plan.  Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.

Section 6. Restricted Stock

6.1.Sale of Restricted StockPursuantThe Compensation Committee may sell Shares of Restricted Stock to such officers and directors as it determines.  The sales price of Shares shall be at a significant discount to the Fair Market Value of the Shares, generally at a per Share price equal to the par value of the Shares sold.  Sales of Restricted Stock shall be subject to such restrictions on transfer and the Repurchase of Restricted Stock by the Company and such other terms and conditions, subject to the provisions of the Plan, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

6.2.Restricted Period.At the time a Sale of Restricted Stock is made to a Participant, the Compensation Committee shall establish a period of time during which the transfer of the Shares of Restricted Stock shall be restricted and after which the Shares of Restricted Stock shall be vested (the “Restricted Period”). Each Sale of Restricted Stock may grant awardshave a different Restricted Period.  The Compensation Committee shall determine the Restricted Period for all Restricted Stock.

6.3.Escrow.Each Participant purchasing Restricted Stock shall enter into a Stock Restriction Agreement with the Company setting forth the terms, conditions and restrictions of restrictedthe Sale.  Any certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the Participant and deposited with the Company, or an escrow agent as determined by the Compensation Committee, together with a stock onpower for each certificate endorsed in blank by the Participant. Each such certificate shall bear a legend in substantially the following form:

The transferability of this certificate and the shares of Common Stock represented by it are subject to the terms and conditions set forthcontained in the Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. 2010 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”), and an agreement entered into between the registered owner and Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. Copies of the Plan and the agreement are on file at the principal office of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

Alternatively, in the discretion of the Company, ownership of the Shares of Restricted Stock and the appropriate restrictions shall be reflected in the records of the Company’s transfer agent and no physical stock certificates shall be issued prior to vesting.

APPENDIX A, Page 5 of 8


6.4.Dividends.    Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee or provided in the Stock Restriction Agreement, Participants holding Restricted Stock will be eligible to receive all dividends paid with respect to such Shares.  If any dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, or consist of a dividend or distribution to holders of Shares other than an ordinary cash dividend, the Shares or other property will be subject to the same restrictions on transferability as the Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid and such Shares or other property shall be deposited with the Company or in escrow as provided in Section 6.3.

6.5.Repurchase of Restricted Stock.In the event any Shares of Restricted Stock under the terms of the Stock Restriction Agreement (including any additional shares of Restricted Stock that may result from changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 7.1) do not vest, the Company shall repurchase (“Repurchase”) such Shares from the affected Participant for a price equal to the original sale price.  All repurchased Shares shall be surrendered to the Company and the stock certificates representing such Shares shall be cancelled.

6.6.Expiration of Restricted Period.    Upon the expiration of the Restricted Period and the satisfaction of any other conditions prescribed by the Compensation Committee or set forth in the Stock Restriction Agreement, the restrictions applicable to the Restricted Stock shall lapse and, unless otherwise instructed by the Participant, a stock restriction agreement,certificate for the number of Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the restrictions have lapsed shall be released by the Company or from escrow and delivered, free of all such restrictions and legends, except any that may be imposed by law, to the Participant or the Participant’s estate, as the case may be.

6.7.Rights as a Shareholder.Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, each Participant receiving Restricted Stock shall have all the rights of a shareholder with respect to the Shares of Restricted Stock during the Restricted Period, including the conditions for vesting,right to vote any shares of Restricted Stock and to receive payment of dividends subject to the vesting periods, the issue price and the acceleration of vestingprovisions in certain events. The vesting period for any restricted stock award will be a minimum of two years.Section 6.4.

Section 7. Adjustments Due to

7.1.Changes in Capitalization or ControlIn the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares, reclassification of shares, spin-off or other similar change in capitalization or event, or any dividend or distribution to holders of shares of Common StockShares other than an ordinary cash dividend, (i)(a) the number and class of securities available under this Plan, (b) the number of shares of Common Stock availableShares sold under this Plan and (c) the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan, (ii)price payable to a Participant upon the number of shares of Common Stock subject

(26)


to and the repurchase price per share subject to each outstanding restricted stock award, and (iii) the terms of each other outstanding awardRepurchase, shall be equitably adjusted by the Company in the manner determined by the Compensation Committee.

Section 8. Change inIn Control

8.1.Consequences of a Change In Control on Restricted Stock.Upon the occurrence of a Change In Control, except to the extent specifically provided to the contrary in the applicable Stock Restriction Agreement, all restrictions and conditions on all Restricted Stock then outstanding shall automatically lapse and be deemed terminated or satisfied, as applicable.

APPENDIX A, Page 6 of 8


8.2.Change In Control Defined.     On  For purposes of this Plan, “Change In Control” shall mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following:

(i)

any “person” (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (other than a changetrustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company) is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in controlRule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company as definedrepresenting 30% or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding Voting Securities; or

(ii)

during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Incumbent Board”), and any new director, whose election by the Board or nomination by the Board for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds () of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board, or

(iii)

the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the Plan, exceptVoting Securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into Voting Securities of the extent provided tosurviving entity) at least 80% of the contrarytotal voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or

(iv)

the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

As used in this Section 8.2, the term “Voting Securities” means the Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01666 per share, and any other securities of the Company that vote generally in the stock restriction agreement between a participant and the Company, all restrictions and conditions on all restricted stock awards then outstanding shall automatically lapse and be deemed terminated or satisfied, as applicable.election of directors.

Section 9. General Provisions

9.1.Transferability of AwardsRestricted Stock.     Unless otherwise provided byExcept as the Compensation Committee restricted stock willmay otherwise determine or provide in a Stock Restriction Agreement, Restricted Stock may not be nontransferable,sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered by Participants holding Restricted Stock, either voluntarily or by operation of law, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order.  References herein to a Participant, to the extent relevant in the context, shall include references to authorized transferees.

Voting and Dividends.     Holders of shares of restricted stock may vote their shares. Dividends are paid on restricted stock.9.2.

Termination of EmploymentStatus.The Compensation Committee willshall determine the effect on restricted stock due toRestricted Stock of the disability,Disability, death, early or normal retirement, termination or other cessation of employment, authorized leave of absence or other change in the employment of a participant.Participant.

APPENDIX A, Page 7 of 8


Tax 9.3.Withholding.     A participant in the 2010 Restricted Stock PlanThe Participant must satisfy all applicable federal, state, and local or other income and employment tax withholding obligations before the Company will authorize the Shares to be released from escrow to the Participant.  The Company may decide to satisfy the withholding obligations through additional withholding on salary or wages.  If the Company elects not to or cannot withhold from other compensation, the Participant must pay the Company the full amount, if any, required for withholding.  Payment of withholding obligations is due before the Company will authorize the release of the Shares.  Ifapproved by the Compensation Committee, a Participant may satisfy such tax obligations in whole or in part by delivery of a portion of the Restricted Stock creating the tax obligation, valued at Fair Market Value; provided, however, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, that the total tax withholding where Restricted Stock is being used to satisfy such tax obligations cannot exceed the Company’s minimum statutory withholding obligations (based on minimum statutory withholding rates for federal and state tax purposes, including payroll taxes, that are applicable to such supplemental taxable income).  Shares surrendered to satisfy tax withholding requirements cannot be subject to any repurchase, forfeiture, unfulfilled vesting or other similar requirements.

9.4.Other Conditions on Delivery of StockThe Company will not be obligated to remove restrictions from Shares previously delivered under the Plan until (a) all conditions of the Sale have been met or removed to the satisfaction of the Company, before it will authorize(b) in the restrictedopinion of the Company’s counsel, all other legal matters in connection with the delivery of such Shares have been satisfied, including any applicable securities laws and any applicable stock exchange or stock market rules and regulations, and (c) the Participant has executed and delivered to be released by the Company such representations or from escrow. The Compensation Committeeagreements as the Company may allow a participantconsider appropriate to satisfy allthe requirements of any applicable laws, rules or partregulations.

Section 10. Miscellaneous

10.1.No Right to Continued Employment.  No Participant under the Plan who is an officer of these withholding obligations by transferring sharesthe Company shall have any right, because of restricted stockhis or her participation, to continue in the Company.employment of the Company for any period of time or to any right to continue his or her present or any other rate of compensation.

10.2.Amendment of Awards.    The Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan or any portion of the Plan at any time; provided that if at any time the approval of the Company’s shareholders is required as tofor any modification or amendment under applicable laws and rules, the Compensation Committee may not effect such modification or amendment without shareholdersuch approval.  Unless otherwise specified in the amendment, any amendment to the 2010 Restricted Stock Plan adopted in accordance with this Section 10.2 shall apply to, and be binding on, the holders of restricted stockall Shares of Restricted Stock outstanding under the Plan at the time the amendment is adopted, provided the Compensation Committee determines that such amendment, taking into account any related action, does not materially and adversely affect the rights of participantsexisting Participants under the Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.    The following table provides information on the holdings10.3.Compliance with Code Section 409A.  No Sale of restricted stock by our executive officers at the end of fiscal 2011. No shares of restricted stock are vested.

(27)


OUTSTANDINGRESTRICTEDSTOCKAWARDSAT 2011FISCALYEAR-END

Grant DateApproval DateNumber of Shares  of
Restricted Stock That
Have Not Vested
Market Value of  Shares
of Restricted Stock That
Have Not Vested(5)

Michael C. Coffman


June 18, 2010
December 21, 2010


May 19, 2010
December 21, 2010


3,500

9,821

(1)(2) 

(3)(4) 

$
$
99,295
278,622

Paul F. Blanchard, Jr.


June 18, 2010
December 21, 2010


May 19, 2010
December 21, 2010


5,000

7,741

(1)(2) 

(3)(4) 

$
$
141,850
219,612

(1)Mr. Coffman and Mr. Blanchard paid $0.01666 per share, or $58.31 and $83.30, respectively, to purchase their restricted stock.
(2)Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on June 18, 2010 which vest on the completion of five years of service, commonly known as “cliff vesting”.
(3)Mr. Coffman and Mr. Blanchard paid $0.01666 per share, or $163.62 and $128.97, respectively, to purchase their restricted stock.
(4)Consists of the restricted stock awards granted on December 21, 2010, 50% of which vests on the completion of three years of service, and 50% of which vests based on the market price performance of the Company’s Common Stock at the completion of three years of service.
(5)Based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock of $28.37 on September 30, 2011.

After the grants of restricted stock during fiscal 2011, there are 73,938 shares of common stock available under the 2010 Restricted Stock shall provide for a deferral of compensation within the meaning of section 409A of the Code.

APPENDIX A, Page 8 of 8


10.4.Governing Law.The provisions of the Plan for future grantsand all Sales of restricted stock.

Communications with the Board of Directors

The Company provides an informal process for shareholdersRestricted Stock made hereunder shall be governed by and other interested parties to send communications to its Board. Shareholders or other interested parties who wish to contact the Lead Independent Director, the outside directors as a group, or any of its individual members may do so by writing to: Board of Directors, Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc., 5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73112-5688. Correspondence directed to any individual Board member is referred, unopened, to that member. Correspondence not directed to a particular Board member is referred, unopened, to the Lead Independent Director.

Shareholder Proposals

Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the next annual shareholders meeting to be held in March 2013, and to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, must be received by the Company by October 1, 2012. Any such proposals should be in writing and be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Company’s office at the address shown below under the caption “Form 10-K”, Attention: Secretary. On receipt of any such proposal, the Company will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the proxy statement and any proxyinterpreted in accordance with regulations governing the solicitation of proxies.

Under the Company’s Bylaws, in order for a shareholder to nominate a candidate for director, timely noticelaws of the nomination must be received byState of Oklahoma, excluding choice-of-law principles that would require the Company in advanceapplication of the annual meeting. Ordinarily, such notice must be received not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s meeting. The shareholder filing the notice of nomination must

(28)


describe various matters regarding the nominee, including, but not limited to, such information as name, address, occupation, business background and shares held, and the nominee must deliver a written questionnaire and agreement to the Company covering certain matters as specified in the Bylaws. In order for a shareholder to bring other business before a shareholders’ meeting, timely notice must be received by the Company within the time limits described above in this paragraph for notice of nominationlaws of a candidate for director. Such notice must include a descriptionjurisdiction other than the State of the proposed business, the reasons therefor, and other specified matters. These requirements are separate from the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 described above.

In each case, the notice must be given to the Secretary of the Company at the address shown below under the caption

“Form 10-K”. Any shareholder desiring a copy of the Company’s Bylaws will be furnished one without charge on written request to the Secretary. A copy of the Bylaws is available on the Company’s website atwww.panhandleoilandgas.com.Oklahoma.

AnnualReport to Shareholders

Copies of the Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal 2011 are being mailed with this proxy statement and a copy of the Annual Report is available on the Company’s website at:www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Form 10-K

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is included in the Annual Report to Shareholders mailed with this proxy statement. A separate Form 10-K and copies of the Company’s charters for the various committees of the Board, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Company’s codes of ethics are available, free of charge, on written or oral request made to the Company at the address or telephone number set forth below, or can be viewed at the Company’s website:www.panhandleoilandgas.com.

Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

5400 N. Grand Boulevard, Suite 300

Oklahoma City, OK 73112-5688

405.948.1560

(29)


Other Matters

Management knows of no other matters to be brought before the meeting. However, if any other matters do properly come before the meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by the proxies in the accompanying form will be voted as the Board may recommend. Whether shareholders plan to attend the meeting or not, they are respectfully urged to mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy, which will be returned to them at the meeting if they are present and so request.

001CSN13FE

 

By Order of the Board of Directors
January 27, 2012Lonnie J. Lowry, Secretary

Whether Or Not You Expect To Attend The Meeting, Please Mark, Sign And Date The Enclosed Proxy And Mail It Promptly In The Postage-Paid Envelope Provided.

If Your Shares Are Held By A Broker Or Other Nominee, Please Provide Specific Voting Instructions To The Broker Or Nominee So Your Shares Can Be Voted.

 

(30)


LOGO

LOGO

. MMMMMMMMMMMM Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION MMMMMMMMM Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in X this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card q PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q A Proposals — The Board recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposal 2. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: For Withhold For Withhold + 01—Darryl G. Smette * 02—H. Grant Swartzwelder * * (two vacancies, each for a 3-year term) For Against Abstain 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below WHEN SHARES ARE HELD BY JOINT TENANTS, BOTH SHOULD SIGN. WHEN SIGNING AS ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE OR GUARDIAN, PLEASE GIVE FULL TITLE AS SUCH. IF A CORPORATION, PLEASE SIGN IN FULL CORPORATE NAME BY PRESIDENT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED OFFICER. IF A PARTNERSHIP, PLEASE SIGN IN PARTNERSHIP NAME BY AUTHORIZED PERSON. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1 U P X 1 3 0 2 9 8 2 + 01EY0B


LOGO

q PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proxy — Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. Grand Centre, Suite 300, 5400 North Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73112-5688 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints L. Kelly Harris and Linda K. Schwartz, or either of them, as proxies each with full power of substitution, to represent and vote all of the shares of Class A Common Stock of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. held of record by the undersigned on January 23, 2012, at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 8, 2012, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Should other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxies are further authorized to vote thereon as the Board of Directors may recommend. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS.

Picture 3

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc. 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting

March 5, 2014

2:00 P.M. Oklahoma Time

Tower Hotelf/k/a Marriott Hotel


3233 Northwest Expressway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Picture 6


Picture 8